The argument is implied, it's in the subtext of "if all you have to add is" in that i added something else, but it didnt change the original point, which you failed to register in the first place.
"No evidence is sufficient for the blind"
There's no argument to convince you, because you're not convinced of anything to begin with.
Thats whats called being a faggot.
If i thought your IQ was too low to comprehend the discussion I would have called you retarded. Which again, also is not ad hominem.
I'll add that you're a huge faggot, which is an original comment.
Sure, toss an ad hominem on the pile. Those always pair well with any serious and legitimate argument.
That isn't an ad hominem, it is just an insult.
He is t telling people to disregard your argument because you are a faggot. He is just insulting you.
I'm assuming you realize the "disregard this because you are" is implied in the context and are ignoring it to be obtuse, but carry on.
The argument is implied, it's in the subtext of "if all you have to add is" in that i added something else, but it didnt change the original point, which you failed to register in the first place.
"No evidence is sufficient for the blind"
There's no argument to convince you, because you're not convinced of anything to begin with.
Thats whats called being a faggot.
If i thought your IQ was too low to comprehend the discussion I would have called you retarded. Which again, also is not ad hominem.