Never forget: They want you dead and your children raped, and they think its funny
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
The argument is implied, it's in the subtext of "if all you have to add is" in that i added something else, but it didnt change the original point, which you failed to register in the first place.
"No evidence is sufficient for the blind"
There's no argument to convince you, because you're not convinced of anything to begin with.
Thats whats called being a faggot.
If i thought your IQ was too low to comprehend the discussion I would have called you retarded. Which again, also is not ad hominem.
Alright, so after all that, you've circled us back to square one, that being that you claim to an objective fact you cannot observe nor derive, and when challenged to present evidence for your, and I'll say again for emphasis, supposedly objectively verifiable standard, the replies furnished have been references to a children's movie about space wizards fighting with plasma swords and simple psionics and a few childish insults.
And yet you prance and preen as though you have won some great victory and demonstrated your righteousness. You call me blind and say I refuse to accept evidence without actually presenting any. You say I have no convictions because I refuse to capitulate in total to your ideas.
And you see nothing foul in this behavior. This is your just and moral act. Even if the objective morality you claim to exist would decry such lies and falsehoods, and would compel you to seek truth and understanding, if you actually chose to follow it.
If that isn't itself a poignant instance of revealed preferences showcasing that either you also understand subconsciously that morals are relative and use that to fuel your self-righteousness in the moment as you allow your "objective" standards to mold and shift, or you yourself fail to life up to the simplest tenants of a system you insist is clear and objective, which strongly suggests that perhaps there isn't an objective morality that permeates all of humankind the same way gravity suffuses the area around the Earth, since you can so easily defy the former and require such effort to defy the latter.
Regardless of which of the two it is, the crux of the matter is that you still haven't actually produced any evidence for the existence of objective morality. The only argument presented, which I can't recall if it was by you or by someone else, was that christian-pattern nations TENDED to more often than other produce prosperous nations then others, and that's no argument for objectivity; merely an argument for the utility of that set of relative morals as compared to others in the context of nation building.
So, please, go ahead and actually produce some evidence. I'm perfectly willing to examine evidence as soon as any is actually furnished.
Hmmm.
Nah.
You're a faggot.
Its nice to see the balkanization of the internet has resulted in a nice, even mix of retards and adults with the mental development of small children on both side, at least.
Confirms some basic theories about humanity.
Anyway, have a day. Nice, shitty, whatever, I'm done caring. At this point, I've had more productive conversations with actual retarded people.
Yet another sperg comment from a faggot nigger retard.