The good Trump is back
(truthsocial.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
He literally gave them days to evacuate. He wasn't indiscriminately bombing civilian targets or even conventional military bases. Since his first presidency, "we will bomb you if you try to make nukes" was on record.
Israel and Iran have been trading shots intermittently for years, you can't blame their bullshit on Trump.
I'm not sure what your argument is. They should be OK with their nuclear facilities being bombed, unprovoked, because he "gave them days to evacuate"? If Iran does so with American nuclear facilities, that's OK too?
He only green-lit Israel doing that. Literally bombing an apartment complex because a nuclear scientist lived there.
They didn't, and he still bombed them.
Who says I want to blame Trump? This was a full-scale war that Trump green-lit after repeatedly telling Netanyahu NO. It was completely unnecessary. As you can see, I give him credit when credit is due, but also criticism when that is due.
Yes, because israel is a US military asset and waits for our green light to do anything - no wait, they don't do that at all.
Iran having nuclear enrichment facilities is not allowed. Your false moral equivalency attempt fails. No sane US president will tolerate nuclear proliferation, especially by a nation run by a religion that believes suicidal acts of war are holy, and has consistently called for our death.
If a lunatic down the street was constantly calling for your death, and then started stockpiling gas cans, you'd be wise to do something about it as well. Nuclear weapons are a strategic threat in ways that conventional armies aren't.
It is reported that they did. But let's say that they didn't. Then he should have pushed back against an 'ally' sabotaging his negotiations and even killing the lead negotiator who was talking with him in a Pearl Harbor type attack?
Under a rule that you just pulled out of your something? Nuclear enrichment is a right that's protected under the NPT.
Your non-attempt to establish that this was a moral equivalency, let alone a false one, did not exist so it did not fail.
How can you say that after they showed that they're far more careful, deliberate and calculating than any of the two nuclear powers that attacked them?
You have a severe case of Fixed Noise-itis. They didn't call for your 'death'. America is a country. It can't die. They say "down with America", because you coup'ed their government, incited a war of aggression against them by Saddam, then gave Saddam chemical weapons to use against their troops and civilians, and then shot a civilian airliner, and then imposed sanctions to try to destroy the country.
I'd be pretty pissed if you did that to me!
If a lunatic down the street incited by neighbor to come beat me up, and then gave him... gas cans... to attack me with, I might say "down with that lunatic down the street" or even, horror of horrors, "death to that lunatic down the street".
Right, they might prevent you from launching a war of aggression against a country. That's why even though Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon, they might want one now.
And now you're playing moral defender of a theocratic dictatorship.
Regardless of that stupidity, on a strategic level no American president should tolerate nuclear proliferation by Iran. No matter how much you might think "they should be allowed to" they've threatened to use them on us. As a matter of practicality, denying nuclear resources to Iran is required.
Tehran will restore its nuclear program, Iranian atomic chief vows
Now what?
Then bomb it again. They pose no conventional threat to us and they can't stop us from doing it. We can keep stopping them for longer than they can keep doing it.