The good Trump is back
(truthsocial.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
It is reported that they did. But let's say that they didn't. Then he should have pushed back against an 'ally' sabotaging his negotiations and even killing the lead negotiator who was talking with him in a Pearl Harbor type attack?
Under a rule that you just pulled out of your something? Nuclear enrichment is a right that's protected under the NPT.
Your non-attempt to establish that this was a moral equivalency, let alone a false one, did not exist so it did not fail.
How can you say that after they showed that they're far more careful, deliberate and calculating than any of the two nuclear powers that attacked them?
You have a severe case of Fixed Noise-itis. They didn't call for your 'death'. America is a country. It can't die. They say "down with America", because you coup'ed their government, incited a war of aggression against them by Saddam, then gave Saddam chemical weapons to use against their troops and civilians, and then shot a civilian airliner, and then imposed sanctions to try to destroy the country.
I'd be pretty pissed if you did that to me!
If a lunatic down the street incited by neighbor to come beat me up, and then gave him... gas cans... to attack me with, I might say "down with that lunatic down the street" or even, horror of horrors, "death to that lunatic down the street".
Right, they might prevent you from launching a war of aggression against a country. That's why even though Iran wasn't developing a nuclear weapon, they might want one now.
And now you're playing moral defender of a theocratic dictatorship.
Regardless of that stupidity, on a strategic level no American president should tolerate nuclear proliferation by Iran. No matter how much you might think "they should be allowed to" they've threatened to use them on us. As a matter of practicality, denying nuclear resources to Iran is required.
FYI: "you're pro-Saddam" or "you're pro-Putin" if you oppose our war doesn't work anymore. You would have addressed the points if you could have, but it's obvious that you can't. The fact that it's a government not to your liking is no reason at all to go bomb them.
And why shouldn't I bring up that while you feign outrage over "down with America", you got hundreds of thousands of their country's people killed? Or is that too justified because those people were ruled by a "theocratic dictatorship"?
Already addressed. There was no 'nuclear proliferation', and you knew that, because you pulled out of your ass that "Iran is not allowed to enrich uranium". Yes they are, both under the NPT and even under the Obama nuclear agreement.
It's not what I "think". It's what they're allowed to do under international law, as opposed to what they're allowed under what you pull out of your ass.
A blatant lie. One that you didn't make up yourself, but which you were fed by malevolent warmongers, and which you're repeating because you have no idea. You know nothing about the country you're demanding be destroyed, like Ted Cruz, nor about what they've supposedly done. All you know is that you want the newest war promoted by the deep state. After all, you're "pro-Khamenei" if you don't.
Useful idiot.
I wasn't speaking about any gay treaty and you should be more than able to pick that up, euro.
I don't care what some treaty says they can do with nuclear material. If they're trying to build nukes, no, they don't get to. The US says go fuck yourself. Not allowed.
I'm not calling for war with Iran. I'm saying that the nation equivalent of a mentally ill child throwing a temper tantrum gets told to shut up and stick to playing in their sandbox, or they get spanked.
No nukes for deranged muslims. No nuclear proliferation at all, by anyone, preferably.
And you LITERALLY DID play moral defender for them by claiming developing nukes was their right and they are trustworthy with nuclear material, which is a laughable claim. Nukes aren't a right. The world doesn't run on rights, either. No lunatics get nukes while someone sane is still in charge of the largest military on earth.
So... when you were talking about what they have a "right" to do, it's not about any treaty nor anything in the real world, just what you pulled out of your ass. As I said.
Thank you for accidentally reverse engineering the NPT. Do you know what the P stands for, Senator? Good news: Iran wudn't trying to build nukes.
What do you think bombing nuclear facilities is? A game?
Why are you even talking about nukes? Because Fixed Noise told you that Iran was weeks from a nuclear weapon, which Israel has been claiming for 30 years now?
I didn't, because as long as they're subscribed to the NPT, they don't. I said that they might want one now. Because you just went out and bombed their country and killed 1000 people, mkaaay? This may shock you, but people... don't like being bombed.
Yeah, that's why there are inspections under the NPT, which you apparently didn't know either. Information that you used to bomb them, by the way?
Well, thank you for admitting that no basically US president has ever been sane.
It's funny that your claim that "THEY SWORE THAT THEY WOULD NUKE US" just disappeared. Never even addressed. I'd be deeply embarrassed and ashamed if I fell for such a blatant lie, let alone if I started spouting it to other people. But you just gladly hobble on, making the next series of absurd claims, leaving your earlier absurd claims on the wayside like so much roadkill. Always wrong, but never in doubt.