Then bomb it again. They pose no conventional threat to us and they can't stop us from doing it. We can keep stopping them for longer than they can keep doing it.
They have 2000 missiles, or had before this war, and you have 40,000 troop stationed in the Middle East as sitting ducks.
Just because those "suicidal theocratic nutjobs" exercised restraint this time doesn't mean that you get to mess with them indefinitely and expect that you'll never cross a red line.
"Just bomb them bruh" - the motto of the Mark Levin fan.
No conventional threat doesn't mean they can't kill a few thousand dudes, it means that in a conventional war we would obliterate them uncontestedly.
You really don't understand how military analysis works. That's fine, most people don't, but pretending you do is a poor joke.
The point of that line in its context is that we have no need to target their conventional military for our own security. We do need to stop them from getting nukes.
No conventional threat doesn't mean they can't kill a few thousand dudes, it means that in a conventional war we would obliterate them uncontestedly.
Which you're never going to launch, so it's quite an empty threat. All you'll do is bomb some people, which didn't even work on the houthis. I'm still laughing about how the US got its ass kicked by the houthis.
You really don't understand how military analysis works. That's fine, most people don't, but pretending you do is a poor joke.
That's rich coming from you. I'm not pretending to be anything. But you're confidently asserting the most absurd claims, like "Iran doesn't have the right to enrich uranium", when it does, that "it vowed to destroy us with nukes", when it never did.
Understanding is not listening and repeating Fixed Noise and Mark Levin's screech-show.
We do need to stop them from getting nukes.
Well, keep working on that magic wand then. Cause the real world isn't a guy with a peanut allergy saying "THE PEOPLE WE BOMB SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES". You said the same thing about North Korea, and guess what.
Tehran will restore its nuclear program, Iranian atomic chief vows
Now what?
Then bomb it again. They pose no conventional threat to us and they can't stop us from doing it. We can keep stopping them for longer than they can keep doing it.
They have 2000 missiles, or had before this war, and you have 40,000 troop stationed in the Middle East as sitting ducks.
Just because those "suicidal theocratic nutjobs" exercised restraint this time doesn't mean that you get to mess with them indefinitely and expect that you'll never cross a red line.
"Just bomb them bruh" - the motto of the Mark Levin fan.
No conventional threat doesn't mean they can't kill a few thousand dudes, it means that in a conventional war we would obliterate them uncontestedly.
You really don't understand how military analysis works. That's fine, most people don't, but pretending you do is a poor joke.
The point of that line in its context is that we have no need to target their conventional military for our own security. We do need to stop them from getting nukes.
Which you're never going to launch, so it's quite an empty threat. All you'll do is bomb some people, which didn't even work on the houthis. I'm still laughing about how the US got its ass kicked by the houthis.
That's rich coming from you. I'm not pretending to be anything. But you're confidently asserting the most absurd claims, like "Iran doesn't have the right to enrich uranium", when it does, that "it vowed to destroy us with nukes", when it never did.
Understanding is not listening and repeating Fixed Noise and Mark Levin's screech-show.
Well, keep working on that magic wand then. Cause the real world isn't a guy with a peanut allergy saying "THE PEOPLE WE BOMB SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES". You said the same thing about North Korea, and guess what.