You are an ahistorical faggot, pushing actual Jihadist propaganda.
The "Arabs" were not allies in WW2, and many of the arab states, at the time, worked with the Nazis. The US made deals with the House of Saoud and the King Hussein, among others. This was not done because we needed them to defeat the Nazis. It was done so that we could secure oil fields going forwards. This is why the Petrodollar was invented. If you think for even two seconds that the House of Saud has felt "betrayed" in the past 70 years by the US, your an idiot.
Osama Bin Laden attacked the US because his ideology decreed that the US was a degenerate, anti-moral, anti-civilization force... since at least 1952. Sayid Qtb explicitly stated that the US must be destroyed and Americans should be exterminated or forced to convert... because he saw boys and girls dancing in a church while "Baby It's Cold Outside" played.
That is the "betrayal" you're talking about. We betrayed Islamo-Fascists because we let boys and girls dance.
He might just be getting world wars mixed up, which I see all the time around here. Ever hear of a guy called Lawrence of Arabia? He stirred up a big Arab revolt inside the Ottoman Empire during WW1 with the promise of Arab Independence after the war, including in the Palestine region.
Unfortunately, another Brit named Balfour had promised that land to another group, so after the Ottoman Empire was dismantled the Brits ended up owning the British Mandate of Palestine and trying(failing) to satisfy two different groups they'd promised the land to, which led directly to a century of chaos and mayhem in the region. Pretty sure that's what he was talking about.
I'll accept that the Balford Declaration will piss some people off, but that's not what the Arab world sees as a "betrayal". If anything, the declaration itself is merely Great Power politics taking place on their territory that they resent not being able to control.
That's just not the same thing as Jihadism and 9/11.
They would have been better off staying part of a stable empire, but they fought and died for England instead, then England basically said, "sorry mate, we can't give you everything we promised." Of course that'll anger them, old T.E. Lawrence made a promise that couldn't be fulfilled.
Granted, those ragheaded heathens are all a bunch of jihadist assholes who would hate us regardless for being infidels, but it's understandable that they have plenty of other reasons to hate Westerners.
I can understand that betrayal, but that is mostly of the Bedowins, and they don't have any significant political power anymore. A lot of them actually participated in the Lawrence Of Arabia movie because it was a seminal part of their history. There's not too much bad blood anymore regarding that era. It's just unrelated to 9/11.
The Ottoman Empire fought and died FOR England?
Wow! Here I thought they were, in WW1, at war with England, Russia and the rest. And neutral in WW2. Silly me 😅
The Saudis are the American's stooges for betrayal. The very fact that you use a usurper tyrant regime as your mental stand-in for the Arabs shows how much of a retarded faggot you are. Everything you have said is ahistorical nonsense, literal Zionist propaganda that only a retard would believe.
You are an ahistorical faggot, pushing actual Jihadist propaganda.
The "Arabs" were not allies in WW2, and many of the arab states, at the time, worked with the Nazis. The US made deals with the House of Saoud and the King Hussein, among others. This was not done because we needed them to defeat the Nazis. It was done so that we could secure oil fields going forwards. This is why the Petrodollar was invented. If you think for even two seconds that the House of Saud has felt "betrayed" in the past 70 years by the US, your an idiot.
Osama Bin Laden attacked the US because his ideology decreed that the US was a degenerate, anti-moral, anti-civilization force... since at least 1952. Sayid Qtb explicitly stated that the US must be destroyed and Americans should be exterminated or forced to convert... because he saw boys and girls dancing in a church while "Baby It's Cold Outside" played.
That is the "betrayal" you're talking about. We betrayed Islamo-Fascists because we let boys and girls dance.
He might just be getting world wars mixed up, which I see all the time around here. Ever hear of a guy called Lawrence of Arabia? He stirred up a big Arab revolt inside the Ottoman Empire during WW1 with the promise of Arab Independence after the war, including in the Palestine region.
Unfortunately, another Brit named Balfour had promised that land to another group, so after the Ottoman Empire was dismantled the Brits ended up owning the British Mandate of Palestine and trying(failing) to satisfy two different groups they'd promised the land to, which led directly to a century of chaos and mayhem in the region. Pretty sure that's what he was talking about.
I'll accept that the Balford Declaration will piss some people off, but that's not what the Arab world sees as a "betrayal". If anything, the declaration itself is merely Great Power politics taking place on their territory that they resent not being able to control.
That's just not the same thing as Jihadism and 9/11.
They would have been better off staying part of a stable empire, but they fought and died for England instead, then England basically said, "sorry mate, we can't give you everything we promised." Of course that'll anger them, old T.E. Lawrence made a promise that couldn't be fulfilled.
Granted, those ragheaded heathens are all a bunch of jihadist assholes who would hate us regardless for being infidels, but it's understandable that they have plenty of other reasons to hate Westerners.
I can understand that betrayal, but that is mostly of the Bedowins, and they don't have any significant political power anymore. A lot of them actually participated in the Lawrence Of Arabia movie because it was a seminal part of their history. There's not too much bad blood anymore regarding that era. It's just unrelated to 9/11.
The Ottoman Empire fought and died FOR England?
Wow! Here I thought they were, in WW1, at war with England, Russia and the rest. And neutral in WW2. Silly me 😅
Yeah you are right, I meant WWI. It's been a long time and my memory gets hazy after 100 years.
The Saudis are the American's stooges for betrayal. The very fact that you use a usurper tyrant regime as your mental stand-in for the Arabs shows how much of a retarded faggot you are. Everything you have said is ahistorical nonsense, literal Zionist propaganda that only a retard would believe.
Betrayal of what? We wanted their oil, we gave them power.