They did the meme!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
Quote it.
US intelligence is a contradiction in terms.
Got it, not supporting senseless wars is 'far-left'.
I thought you were a 2000s "right-winger" time-warped into the present. Turns out you're using Cold War-era insults. I guess not supporting theft is "communism" now?
This is beyond absurd. People aren't "the Russian state". The tsar's family can have personal accounts as well as accounts in name of the Russian state.
I've heard that from more people. Did you get any message about that?
Hold on. You keep moving the goalposts. You were complaining that Biden and Obama "gave" the Iranians money. That was, of course, their own money from oil sales. Why don't you address that fact instead?
And the difference is that you label anyone you don't like an "international terrorist organization", while calling the ISIS/Al Qaeda terrorists the Deep State funded "revolutionaries". That's it, isn't it?
So... "we do the exact same thing as Iran, but to a lesser extent".
I don't support "nations" unconditionally. When Israel defends itself in the aftermath of October 7, I supported that. When Israel bombs Syria or Iran, with no casus belli, I find that contemptible, and Iran has every right to respond to that.
I'm not talking about Hamas. I'm talking about Israel's unprovoked assault on Iran. If you're cheering this, no doubt you were also cheering when Israel was bombing Syria. Great job, now ISIS and Al Qaeda are in charge. Or is that good because it aligns with the Deep State?
Look it up yourself. The "Final UN Report On WMDs" or whatever it's official title was? It was utterly ignored by the Media because it said there were both WMDs and Atomic Weapons programs active under Saddam. Exactly as Bush said.
They knew they had WMDs because the US sold them to Iraq. 🙄
Remember: the "they have WMDs" was "the sizzle" used to sell it to the US public. The "steak" was all the rest of the valid reasons, which are dry and take time, research & an IQ over room temperature to understand.
Didn't you just say the opposite about Iran? Isn't the argument for "returning Iran's "own money"" that The Shaw exploited the people of Iran for his personal wealth? Therefore his wealth actually belongs to the people/state? Even moreso for the Tsars.
Later you say it was their money "from oil sales" which were illegal under international embargos and thus lawfully confiscated & held for the next legitimate government of Iran. It's not just the US doing it, but they're burdened with actually enforcing it while European companies violate their own laws & make wads of $$$.
All they gave me was a link to the thread involved, with ~100+ comments. I figured out which was my offending comment from the deleted ones, and remembered I had replied with a joke to another comment which was also deleted. :/ The appeals just got the same form message, no word on what I had said that violated the rules.
I make an illegal right turn, you went 100 mph through a school zone at lunchtime... SAME THING! 😸 So yes.
Neither do I. When Israel or any nation does bad things, I condemn them too. People (usually leftists) often ask me "Why don't you condemn them LOTS and LOUDLY?" To which I reply "Why should I when there's already 5 posts condemning this & 50 people screaming about it?" 🤔 I say I condemn it & why, but that's not good enough! I must march in lock-step with the left! So I'm told.
Israel has excessive "cause bellum" to bomb Syria or Iran! Assad had a chemical weapons program (fact) & Israel blew it to hell (fact) despite Russia having given Assad advanced air defenses (fact). Assad regularly launched missiles into Israel, supported terrorist groups & allowed weapon shipments to those groups.
If you're talking about Iran? You are also talking about it's proxy-armies too. It's like only talking about 3 of an octopus's arms & pretending the other 5 don't exist. Octopuses don't have 3 arms, ok? They have 8.
If 5 of them are strangling me, you point to the 3 that aren't and say "that octopus isn't harming you, these 3 arms are totally innocent! Leave the poor octopus alone!" 🙄
You're citing it in an argument. It's apparently too much of an effort to look it up yourself, so you expect me to do your work for you?
I mean, of course, it's complete nonsense. You're just still sipping the Bush Kool Aid, more than anyone.
And they were destroyed soon after the first Iraq War. Speaking of which, I thought you were such great humanitarians, and that you try to avoid civilian casualties. But you sell WMDs to Iraq so it can use them on civilian targets and even "his own people"?
I think I clearly pointed out that I was not talking about any 1979 seizures, but the more recent ones. That's the money that Obama returned by unfreezing bank assets, right?
Is it? I assume you're going to tell me to LOOK IT UP YOURSELF here as well. So I'll just laugh at the fact that you try to invoke international law while defending the war in Iraq.
There have been people who didn't even get that. Only "violations of policy as a user and a moderator".
Rather, "you went 100 mph through a school zone JUST LIKE ME but you did it once more!"
Of course, that's not even true, but just your vapid claim. If you look at the number of regime changes and coups that your beloved deep state neocons have sponsored, it's quite a bit more than those dreaded Eye-Ran-Ians.
You do? I sure didn't notice, but props if you do anyway.
This looks like an AI hallucination. If it's not, please think your claims through before posting it. It's not illegal for Syria to have had a chemical weapons program, nor did Israel blow it up - but the bombings of Syria were an act of illegal aggression under international law which your deep state friends habitually violate, even while you hide behind it when you think it can provide you cover.
Is there a single deep state war / act of aggression that you DON'T support?
I thought you defended proxy armies as "revolutionaries" when it suits the deep state thugs.
So wait, people have the right to strike back at the US for sponsoring proxy armies? I agree. Too bad the only way to do that is to develop nuclear weapons.
Um, what? Me? When did I say anything remotely like that? Are you projecting? 🤨
And I was clearly talking about how the assets seized from illegal oil sales does not belong to the current government, but to the next legitimate government of Iran. You aren't aware of the various embargos the international community has against Iran? Ok then.
Do I need to link you the meaning of "hyperbole" again? 😹
I do! When it's real and not propaganda from Israel's enemies, including the US Media and entire Democrat party. Like Al-Ahli Hospital for a clear example. Unless 200 people were in that parking lot? Or 900+ people were in an 80 bed unit? It's pretty obvious it was a Hamas group's rocket falling short.
Look at this MASSIVE crater!
Oh ffs, your ignorance of facts is not my problem bro. How many times will I link facts before you admit I "might" have a firm grasp on them? 10? 50? 100? I've done that in the past, linked well over 100 times to prove my points & the guy still refused to believe a word I said. He'd also link "proofs" of his "facts" but at least half of them actually supported my position or had no relation to what he claimed.
Read it and weep or is this a "Mossad front" now?
I'll presume you're using hyperbole when you justify using nuclear weapons on 3rd party civilians. 🤣
You're defending US deep state actions, so... 'you'.
It's noted that you couldn't substantiate your claim about Iraqi WMD being moved to Syria.
You were "clearly" talking about all sorts of things that ain't so, like oil sales being illegal. Quite rich from an Iraq War supporter, too... the paradigmatic illegal action under international law.
Claiming that Iran has done more coups and regime change isn't even hyperbole, just a straight up lie.
Great, you managed to not condemn something that I didn't bring up. Do you mind mentioning what you do condemn? So far, zilch.
There's a good reason you cut out what came after, and instead resorted to name-calling. It's because your deep state talking points fail quite hard when confronted with actual facts: "It's not illegal for Syria to have had a chemical weapons program, nor did Israel blow it up - but the bombings of Syria were an act of illegal aggression under international law which your deep state friends habitually violate, even while you hide behind it when you think it can provide you cover."
So far, you're at zero. The only good point you made was about the accuracy of weapons, and that was logic, not facts.
Absolutely brilliant. You do know that the terrorists your government supported had driven Assad out by the time of this particular Israeli airstrike, right? Again: you really have no idea what you're talking about, beyond regurgitating neocon talking points.
I'm glad to hear you oppose your country's nuking of Japan. You started out with some intelligent comments before going off the rails, and hopefully, you can return there.