Shouldn't you be fighting towelheads, jew? Or are you except because they dont let 85 iq mentally retarded jew housewives do anything but post online for a quarter shekel
Because its an obvious military target, and we live in the modern era with missiles that means they can technically hit anywhere they want without care of where its buried.
Its a question of caring about the morals/ethics of protecting civilians from the consequences of war, or simply only caring about the logistics of "making it easier for us to get to work."
Its a question of caring about the morals/ethics of protecting civilians from the consequences of war
I honestly don't think anyone in the ME is asking this.
When Smith was arguing with Murray about understanding that war means kids being buried alive under rubble until they finally starve to death and die; Smith failed to understand that as a man who's morals stem from Liberalism, he was the only one not advocating for that. Liberal morality isn't Universal, and there's no more clear evidence of that than Middle-Eastern wars.
You asked why a military building should be away from a city, I gave you an answer.
Specifically choosing to use those buildings because they are civilian, instead of simply the laze and ease of the US building near places they live, is a moral evil regardless of what label you want to assign to it. Its always a moral failing that puts the lives of civilians at risk for your own war purposes, and anyone (no matter what country) that does so is telling you everything you need to know about how pathetic and uncaring they are about those lives.
They're no different than Hamas.
You're wrong. They are way worse than hamas. Hamas is just a puppet controlled opposition force paid for by israel. They ARE hamas.
Except Hamas sets up its watering holes in schools and hospitals and Israel avoids bombing civilian areas whenever possible.
That's stupid. That's like complaining that the pentagon was hit because it's in DC.
No shit, it's a head quarters building. Why would be away from a city when it's administrative?
There's a big difference between using a school or mosque as an ammo dump, and having an office building in a city.
Shouldn't you be fighting towelheads, jew? Or are you except because they dont let 85 iq mentally retarded jew housewives do anything but post online for a quarter shekel
I'm not at war, fatty.
Because its an obvious military target, and we live in the modern era with missiles that means they can technically hit anywhere they want without care of where its buried.
Its a question of caring about the morals/ethics of protecting civilians from the consequences of war, or simply only caring about the logistics of "making it easier for us to get to work."
I honestly don't think anyone in the ME is asking this.
When Smith was arguing with Murray about understanding that war means kids being buried alive under rubble until they finally starve to death and die; Smith failed to understand that as a man who's morals stem from Liberalism, he was the only one not advocating for that. Liberal morality isn't Universal, and there's no more clear evidence of that than Middle-Eastern wars.
You asked why a military building should be away from a city, I gave you an answer.
Specifically choosing to use those buildings because they are civilian, instead of simply the laze and ease of the US building near places they live, is a moral evil regardless of what label you want to assign to it. Its always a moral failing that puts the lives of civilians at risk for your own war purposes, and anyone (no matter what country) that does so is telling you everything you need to know about how pathetic and uncaring they are about those lives.