I like what he has said about the most important issue of our time, illegals, but I have gone through his feed and he's got a lot of cope and factually wrong info about the BBB. He straight up says "everything single item in there was a Trump campaign promise" and "this isn't a spending bill". I don't know if that's technically true, but it does spend a lot of money. Stephen Miller is 100% in the "it's a big beautiful bill" camp. Not even "It's not great but it's the best we can do."
Stephen Miller is 100% in the "it's a big beautiful bill" camp.
Like I said, I'd expect him to be biased, but he gives pretty reasonable responses to most of the concerns that people have with the bill.
And as I've also said before in other threads, if this is what is necessary to get ICE funded to the point that it can do what needs to be done, I will take it. I'd rather have more debt and vastly reduced numbers of illegal criminals and tax leeches than less debt and a taqueria on every corner and every construction site speaking Spanish.
Except it’s complete bullshit. ICE did 75% of their arrests so far this year in the first 50 days of the Trump admin. Obama deported 400k in a year with less staff and funding than ICE currently has. The only thing holding ICE back is ICE. This bill is a travesty and a tech bro dream, Trump signed more jeets coming in 2026 than illegals projected to be deported this year. There’s a clause that gives federal tax breaks to tech bros to offset blue states tax rape, making it more profitable to stay in blue states instead of investing in red states. The only good part of the bill is the removal of illegals from welfare services, and even that makes it easier for H-1Bs to get welfare and they get a 20k pay floor increase.
Just to put some context to this: In 2013 ICE under Obama deported 368k illegal aliens. Approx 64% of these deportations were from the border. 133k were from the "interior of the U.S."
Now, that was during a time when the courts and local law enforcement had a working relationship with ICE and the administration.
all when it comes to interior illegal aliens:
82 percent of all interior removals had been previously convicted of a crime.
that means of the 133k, 110k were criminals. Which is pretty fucking easy when LEO and courts just hand them over like they should be doing. Or at least the criminals were given deportation orders instead of protective orders hamstringing ICE.
Just to tie it up in a nice bow, 345 thousand of the 368 thousand were from border arrest and criminals. Leaving 23 thousand in the just illegals being deported for being illegals in 2013.
We have (or at least been told) there are less border crossings, and ICE have to fight for each arrest and I'm not gonna link but reports of local departments releasing illegals instead of handing them over so each fucking arrest is a scramble in the parking lot.
Times have changed, we really can't compare the numbers using the same metrics.
Immigration, both illegal and legal leading to demographic change is the second most important issue of our time. You can’t solve the immigration problem without first addressing the kosher problem, since that group is 100% responsible for demographic change in the U.S., Canada and throughout the rest of the western world. It’s that group’s influence over government policy and control over media that makes Europeans afraid to be unapologetic nationalists, who would be capable of calling out the problems created by demographic shift otherwise. The root cause of demographic shift is way more important to solve than anything else, because without doing so first, your respective ZOG will target you for even speaking about, let alone attempting to organize against demographic shift.
Charlie Kirk (meh) interviews Stephen Miller. If you haven't followed Stephen Miller during this administration, you've missed out. The man is a leftist bullshit destruction machine.
I expect him to be biased in favor of his boss, but he gives a pretty good defense of the Big Beautiful Bill, with a large focus on deportation operations. Also describes the byzantine maze that has to be bypassed to get anything passed.
I definitely trust him on this more than I do whatever government and "independent" agencies are putting out studies talking about how this is going to bankrupt the country.
Maybe I'm just demoralized, but I'll take a zionist Jew who by all appearances actually likes the United States vs. basically everyone else in the government who hates the US and its citizens and sees us as nothing but replaceable tax cattle.
He was also the guy who exposed the UVA rape hoax. He's got a history of tearing up leftist narratives.
I like what he has said about the most important issue of our time, illegals, but I have gone through his feed and he's got a lot of cope and factually wrong info about the BBB. He straight up says "everything single item in there was a Trump campaign promise" and "this isn't a spending bill". I don't know if that's technically true, but it does spend a lot of money. Stephen Miller is 100% in the "it's a big beautiful bill" camp. Not even "It's not great but it's the best we can do."
Like I said, I'd expect him to be biased, but he gives pretty reasonable responses to most of the concerns that people have with the bill.
And as I've also said before in other threads, if this is what is necessary to get ICE funded to the point that it can do what needs to be done, I will take it. I'd rather have more debt and vastly reduced numbers of illegal criminals and tax leeches than less debt and a taqueria on every corner and every construction site speaking Spanish.
Except it’s complete bullshit. ICE did 75% of their arrests so far this year in the first 50 days of the Trump admin. Obama deported 400k in a year with less staff and funding than ICE currently has. The only thing holding ICE back is ICE. This bill is a travesty and a tech bro dream, Trump signed more jeets coming in 2026 than illegals projected to be deported this year. There’s a clause that gives federal tax breaks to tech bros to offset blue states tax rape, making it more profitable to stay in blue states instead of investing in red states. The only good part of the bill is the removal of illegals from welfare services, and even that makes it easier for H-1Bs to get welfare and they get a 20k pay floor increase.
Just to put some context to this: In 2013 ICE under Obama deported 368k illegal aliens. Approx 64% of these deportations were from the border. 133k were from the "interior of the U.S."
Now, that was during a time when the courts and local law enforcement had a working relationship with ICE and the administration.
all when it comes to interior illegal aliens:
that means of the 133k, 110k were criminals. Which is pretty fucking easy when LEO and courts just hand them over like they should be doing. Or at least the criminals were given deportation orders instead of protective orders hamstringing ICE.
Just to tie it up in a nice bow, 345 thousand of the 368 thousand were from border arrest and criminals. Leaving 23 thousand in the just illegals being deported for being illegals in 2013.
We have (or at least been told) there are less border crossings, and ICE have to fight for each arrest and I'm not gonna link but reports of local departments releasing illegals instead of handing them over so each fucking arrest is a scramble in the parking lot.
Times have changed, we really can't compare the numbers using the same metrics.
Immigration, both illegal and legal leading to demographic change is the second most important issue of our time. You can’t solve the immigration problem without first addressing the kosher problem, since that group is 100% responsible for demographic change in the U.S., Canada and throughout the rest of the western world. It’s that group’s influence over government policy and control over media that makes Europeans afraid to be unapologetic nationalists, who would be capable of calling out the problems created by demographic shift otherwise. The root cause of demographic shift is way more important to solve than anything else, because without doing so first, your respective ZOG will target you for even speaking about, let alone attempting to organize against demographic shift.
Charlie Kirk (meh) interviews Stephen Miller. If you haven't followed Stephen Miller during this administration, you've missed out. The man is a leftist bullshit destruction machine.
I expect him to be biased in favor of his boss, but he gives a pretty good defense of the Big Beautiful Bill, with a large focus on deportation operations. Also describes the byzantine maze that has to be bypassed to get anything passed.
I definitely trust him on this more than I do whatever government and "independent" agencies are putting out studies talking about how this is going to bankrupt the country.
Bro Stephen miller is a rabid zionist Jew supporting the new palantir-zio surveillance state. I'm not excited about this at all.
Maybe I'm just demoralized, but I'll take a zionist Jew who by all appearances actually likes the United States vs. basically everyone else in the government who hates the US and its citizens and sees us as nothing but replaceable tax cattle.
He was also the guy who exposed the UVA rape hoax. He's got a history of tearing up leftist narratives.
He likes zog. He isn't deporting anti whites and dual citizens.
Dunno what to tell you. You go with the team you have, not the team you'd like to have.
He's not on your team. Period.
Yes, only the highlights the MAGA base wants without the lowlights pushed by the Zionists in the government