Harvard researcher Dr Sarah Fortune was only two years away from creating a vaccine that could have saved the 1.25 million people killed each year by tuberculosis. But last month, she received a letter telling her that the $60 million grant funding her research was being halted by President Trump.
Whether or not cutting off the funds was good and/or justified, if it's actually true, then she could easily raise that 60 million from other sources.
So at the very least, this is being overinflated. It could be that this was a promising but by no means as certain as they present cure, one of perhaps 5% chance of succeeding. If so, then I could see this being true. But I would find that worth fundng. Why do you have to exaggerate and deceive?
Whether or not cutting off the funds was good and/or justified, if it's actually true, then she could easily raise that 60 million from other sources.
So at the very least, this is being overinflated. It could be that this was a promising but by no means as certain as they present cure, one of perhaps 5% chance of succeeding. If so, then I could see this being true. But I would find that worth fundng. Why do you have to exaggerate and deceive?
If its so damn amazing, why won't Harvad dip into their billions and fucking fund it?
Because... Because... They just shouldn't, okay! Your tax dollars belong to small town mom and pop institutions worth billions, okay?
and then they'll force us to pay an arm and a leg for the vaccine we funded