I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Become self-sufficient and detach from the system at large as much as you can.
Earn a decent salary that's not monstrously overtaxed and buy a house in which to raise a family.
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.
I don't suggest this lightly, because I know from personal experience how difficult it is to uproot and move your whole life elsewhere, but you should give serious thought to leaving. I made that decision due to a variety of factors in the UK that are conspiring to push me out. If I lived in Canada, I would have even less hesitation. If you have children or family that rely on you, I know that is a burdensome prospect, so I wouldn't blame you for deciding not to.
It seems to me that we--talking broadly about dissidents here--stand a better chance at resisting whatever they have in mind for us if we're at least broadly in the same geographic area. I don't believe the US is in any better of a demographic state in the long run, but it is easier there to do two essential things:
Just those two things alone make it a better place for me at least. The housing situation in the UK is complete madness for young families, but from what I've heard about Canada, it's even worse over there.
You left out the most essential thing. We are much harder to "replace" because we are armed to the teeth. Europe wouldn't be nearly as brazen about replacing their population if the spineless cucks hadn't all decided to disarm themselves.
That is indeed very useful, and I also plan on arming myself very well when I get over there, but the last 50 years has thrown into question the value of guns as a political deterrent as such.
Americans have always been very well armed, but the speed of demographic change since 1965 has been lightning quick, and guns don't seem to have done much, if anything, to resist that.
I think that the vast space in America has done a lot to hide the change from most people, and perhaps if it had been more densely populated, like Europe, it would have been obvious enough that they wouldn't have been able to do it quietly like they did.
There may come a time when guns play their part in righting the wrongs that have been done to America, but looking at the broad brushstrokes of metapolitics, I don't think the presence or absence of an armed populace has much to do with whether or not demographics change one way or the other.
No, but America didn't have Australia's interstate COVID checkpoints and concentration camps, so I think the net effect of guns isn't anywhere near zero, even though I agree with your gun-fudd retards point.