ADL goes after hasan
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You know ADL is a utterly shit organization when they've got me even mildly siding with Hasan.
Firstly, he didn't say Hamas was good. (He might think it, I don't know, and I wouldn't be surprised, but that's not what he was saying, which was the claim.)
What fucking serious organization talks like this? Fuck right off. Fake and gay.
No one likes a fucking snitch, crybully, or weasel. You're cowards, all of you.
I will always side against cancel culture and crybullies, even if it means defending a shitbag retard like Hasan.
ADL can get fucked.
ADL is the avatar for modern leftist society:
Fun fact: the adl was founded after a pedophile tried to use the "darkie did it" excuse to get away with murder and failed.
In the deep south. In 1910. With an all White jury.
Hasan has openly stated that hamas is good wtf are you talking about?
Do you know what the fight between Hasan and H3H3 was about? Here's the breakdown:
Hasan believes every jew in Israel should be killed, including the infants, because each of them are oppressors, settlers, and colonizers.
H3H3 believes every jew in the West Bank and Gaza should be killed, including the infants, because each of them are oppressors, settlers, and colonizers. Jews in Tel Aviv and Bethlehem are not colonizers. Unarmed, non-combatant, children are valid military targets to Ethan. And he was the one that Hasan and his audience are claiming is a rabid Zionist.
That was the primary difference. Yes, Hasan supports Hamas because October 7th is a glorious revolution that should literally cross through all of Israel because all of Israel, and every jew within it, is a colonizer of the only legitimate state: Palestine. He does not support geocoding jews outside of Israel, and would support allowing them to leave (to Madagascar, I assume). Someone who says that what Hamas did was justified, including killing non-combatants because there are no civilians in the state of Israel, is a Hamas supporter.
If you want to argue the most extreme form of pedantry, you can claim that Hasan didn't say that what Hamas did was good, but that it was a legitimate and just act against illegal settlers... but that's called "good".
Gizortnik is very angry that a couple of podcasters allegedly want to kill Jewish babies but couldn't care less about the Israel government actually killing babies. They are definitely doing it on purpose, hence the repeated invocation of Amalek.
Spare me. You want dead babies as much as Hasan does, you just prefer that it be jewish babies instead of muslim babies.
Bronze age war, with bronze age mentality, is simply not my problem because my country isn't involved. It sucks that it's happening, but until someone on either side doesn't want dead children, I can't help that. You want dead children too, so I don't value anything you say either.
You claim to be American so your country - our country - is deeply involved. The idea that America isn't involved in this is one of the dumbest things anyone has ever said here.
That's neither here nor there, though. None of that is what was being talked about, and I already allowed I wouldn't be surprised if he legitimately thought Hamas was good.
But that's not what he was doing when he was. He made sensible if biased interpretations of Hamas and Israel, some psycho completely misrepresented him, and then other psychos at the ADL also got on board, everyone going after his platforms.
It has nothing to do with the Hasan/H3H3 thing, because that's not the evidence being cited.
I don't like Hasan, and I'm not defending his arguments, politics, or stance. I'm defending the truth, and refusing to side with cancel culture and the ADL.
The rift between Hassan and H3H3 is his position on Hamas and October 7th. What the ADL is doing is attacking a Hamas supporter by any available means. That what this is about, that's why this is relevant. You said he didn't say he supported Hamas, and he didn't say he supported Hamas in that statement to be specific. Sure, but he is a Hamas supporter, and the ADL is an Israeli front group. At the end of the day, this is just another propaganda front on the war between these two factions. This is their war.
ADL: We'll censor the shit out of you on all media for saying we control the media, goyim.
Now I wonder if Hasan is going to notice what the ADL, the censorious tech oligarchs whi bow to their wishes, the zionist government and the "1%" he hates so much have in common
And if he's willing to go to bat for the free speech rights of others to point it out now that he's got skin in the game?
The answer lies, in my opinion, on whether or not he thinks there's money in that direction. Although I'm sure he has some things he legitimately believes, he doesn't really have principles, and seems to take whatever stance he think will get him attention and money.
Hard to make money (ironic for a communist) if he's deplatformed. But I get ya. Ecelebs gonna eceleb.