What is the point of posturing against socialism if you're going to defend socialist regimes and let them keep everything they steal? It's just pointless virtue signaling at that point, no commitment to stopping them.
Your not taking from Socialist regimes. The Nazis never even tried that. You're taking from people that you are post-hoc declaring to be Socialist in order to rationalize the redistribution of property.
They're the people that got rich under a regime you just called socialist. How does that happen? How do people get rich under socialist regimes, Gizortnik?
So, now that you've argued that Adolf Hitler was a jewish socialist who stole the wealth of Germans, and therefore needed to have his wealth extracted from him... why didn't he think of that when he came to power?
I call a regime Socialist because that's literally what they are by their own definition.
I call you a Communist because you want to use the government to seize private property and re-distribute it for "justice".
I am correct.
What is the point of posturing against socialism if you're going to defend socialist regimes and let them keep everything they steal? It's just pointless virtue signaling at that point, no commitment to stopping them.
Your not taking from Socialist regimes. The Nazis never even tried that. You're taking from people that you are post-hoc declaring to be Socialist in order to rationalize the redistribution of property.
They're the people that got rich under a regime you just called socialist. How does that happen? How do people get rich under socialist regimes, Gizortnik?
Well, one of them sold a book a bunch of times.
So, now that you've argued that Adolf Hitler was a jewish socialist who stole the wealth of Germans, and therefore needed to have his wealth extracted from him... why didn't he think of that when he came to power?