The issue wasn't even about integration. That was the Leftist narrative to justify it. The schools were not segregated. The issue was that bussing was unpopular because it forced middle-class kids to go to poor schools, even if it meant being bussed dozens of miles further. Black kids could attended schools with white kids and vice versa.
The issue was that the government asserted a racial quota system, where kids would be forcibly trafficked to schools in order to claim that the schools were "de-segregated". This was a lie, there was no segregation in Boston at the time, the issue was that there was no mandated racial quota system at the time.
Here's an even better issue: jews were heavily against the racial quotas because it was also effecting their religious schools and private schools and damaging their communities they got over-ruled by Leftist racial nonsense.
Further more, not only was it unpopular it's been unpopular, and was rescinded decades ago because it never desegregated anything.
Why would I make a universal, inter-termporal, homogenous claim into a specifical legal conflict that took place in Boston in the 1970's?
Do I really have to explain to you the context that when I say "jews" I am explicitly referring to: may of the jews of the Boston and New England area, concentrated heavily among the orthodox and religious educational communities, specifically within the 1970's.
Couldn't you have picked up that context by referring to the topic?
Whites protested against segregation, and now protested against it in Boston, and now protested for it at Harvard! Why can't they make up their mind?!!
Because I'm intentionally conflating wildly different people with wildly different contexts with wildly different regions at wildly different times. You are doing the same with jews because it serves your purpose to apply your thinking only to everyone else.
And even then, you're still arguing about segregation, which this wasn't. But repeating Leftist talking points serves your narrative.
The whole reason they did the busing was because they argued the schools were de facto segregated. It happened because Brown did little to change racial composition of schools. This is what people like you did.
You don't know anything about American history.
The issue wasn't even about integration. That was the Leftist narrative to justify it. The schools were not segregated. The issue was that bussing was unpopular because it forced middle-class kids to go to poor schools, even if it meant being bussed dozens of miles further. Black kids could attended schools with white kids and vice versa.
The issue was that the government asserted a racial quota system, where kids would be forcibly trafficked to schools in order to claim that the schools were "de-segregated". This was a lie, there was no segregation in Boston at the time, the issue was that there was no mandated racial quota system at the time.
Here's an even better issue: jews were heavily against the racial quotas because it was also effecting their religious schools and private schools and damaging their communities they got over-ruled by Leftist racial nonsense.
Further more, not only was it unpopular it's been unpopular, and was rescinded decades ago because it never desegregated anything.
Every Jew? No qualifications whatsoever? Really?
Why would I make a universal, inter-termporal, homogenous claim into a specifical legal conflict that took place in Boston in the 1970's?
Do I really have to explain to you the context that when I say "jews" I am explicitly referring to: may of the jews of the Boston and New England area, concentrated heavily among the orthodox and religious educational communities, specifically within the 1970's.
Couldn't you have picked up that context by referring to the topic?
Jews protested against it when it affected them. They protested for it when it affected southerners
Whites protested against segregation, and now protested against it in Boston, and now protested for it at Harvard! Why can't they make up their mind?!!
Because I'm intentionally conflating wildly different people with wildly different contexts with wildly different regions at wildly different times. You are doing the same with jews because it serves your purpose to apply your thinking only to everyone else.
And even then, you're still arguing about segregation, which this wasn't. But repeating Leftist talking points serves your narrative.
You're wildly gay
If you're going to keep repeating Leftist narratives, then you should be congratulating me for that.
The whole reason they did the busing was because they argued the schools were de facto segregated. It happened because Brown did little to change racial composition of schools. This is what people like you did.
They didn't argue their own schools were segregated, that's why they protested it.
You are demanding to assert that white Leftists in Boston are all secretly jews, but they are in fact: Leftists.