Does RW stand for right wing? I've yet to see a tradthot who doesn't out herself as a feminist at some point. They're just more effective grifters than the danger hairs.
I can't decide if you are a sophisticated troll or unironically based.
The sentiment pre-dates Christianity by quite a bit. It is more or less what the ancient Greeks thought about women. That if they were not protected from themselves that they would let their self-centered, animalistic passions lead them to self-destructive behavior.
There is a very good reason that: "women and children" is a fairly common term. Both are protected classes and can't really be held responsible for themselves.
Modern women vacillate between "helpless infant" and "powerful, independent woman" in the space of a sentence. They pick whichever one gives them the largest benefit in any given circumstance.
Then why is he being a douche when I point out we are, as a whole, entirely fucking skeptical of every form of media outside some well known, consistent sources? Even then we keep waiting for them to jump the shark.
Did SmiggieBalls not notice KiA2's response to the COVID19 bullshit? Or the Pro Palestinian bullshit? Why are the conservatives suddenly gullible chumps now?
I didn't start this journey conservatives AF. Not that long ago I was pro immigration and very left leaning. I remember that early in the adventure, there was a political survey of KiA, and that most people there were left-leaning. In general, we have been very open to accepting uncomfortable facts and changing our mind.
I have been, and continue to be, dubious about deep state, including pro-Israel, influence within Trump's government. I think most people here are the same.
But the actual core-level internal wisdom, drive, passion, and knowledge of why conservative ideals are better and should be followed is simply not there. Not like it can be for a man.
This is true. Any woman on the internet should be kept on a very tight leash. Sarah Stock annoys me the most because the signaling is so trite and obvious.
But you overstate the delta. A lot of men basically fall into your woman box as well.
To rephrase my point, I think the delta is overstated and the true picture of "based thinking" is a couple of bell curves with a small area of overlap rather than an on-off switch.
Also the power of orthodoxy (patriarchal or otherwise) to mold women's thinking should not be overlooked. Imprinting is, in many cases, permanent.
I would basically agree with everything you said. I'll also add that God still picks unlikely champions from time to time, although this is in no way a basis to overturn His natural order.
Generally agree but not sure it's fair to say 99.99%. What you're talking about is feminine nature. There's a ton of tomboyish less feminine women, just like there's a lot of faggy men, gay or not, who don't feel comfortable with others of their own sex. Those types of women are more often based or at least have logical takes and not the default Longhouse liberalism reinforced by hormones. They are a minority but we all know someone. ...So I'd say 97%.
(Though I've been mulling the idea over recently that the tomboys were the original proto-feminists. They were the types who legitimately wanted to wear pants and live in men's spaces before it was permitted. They weren't fighting for "women's rights" they literally just wanted to do not-girly stuff.)
No they're fighting over the EmilySavesAmerica chick decrying stay at home mom's and demanding women be girl bosses. She shouldn't have any influence but the EmilySavesAmerica woman unfortunately has a decent amount of reach with right wing women so calling her out is important
More like right wing women are pissed off that a leftjst larper attacked stay at home moms. You're minimizing the cultural attack on conservative values
Does RW stand for right wing? I've yet to see a tradthot who doesn't out herself as a feminist at some point. They're just more effective grifters than the danger hairs.
I can't decide if you are a sophisticated troll or unironically based.
The sentiment pre-dates Christianity by quite a bit. It is more or less what the ancient Greeks thought about women. That if they were not protected from themselves that they would let their self-centered, animalistic passions lead them to self-destructive behavior.
There is a very good reason that: "women and children" is a fairly common term. Both are protected classes and can't really be held responsible for themselves.
Modern women vacillate between "helpless infant" and "powerful, independent woman" in the space of a sentence. They pick whichever one gives them the largest benefit in any given circumstance.
SmiggieBalls has been here a while, he's based
Then why is he being a douche when I point out we are, as a whole, entirely fucking skeptical of every form of media outside some well known, consistent sources? Even then we keep waiting for them to jump the shark.
Did SmiggieBalls not notice KiA2's response to the COVID19 bullshit? Or the Pro Palestinian bullshit? Why are the conservatives suddenly gullible chumps now?
I didn't start this journey conservatives AF. Not that long ago I was pro immigration and very left leaning. I remember that early in the adventure, there was a political survey of KiA, and that most people there were left-leaning. In general, we have been very open to accepting uncomfortable facts and changing our mind.
I have been, and continue to be, dubious about deep state, including pro-Israel, influence within Trump's government. I think most people here are the same.
You two are talking past each other
This is true. Any woman on the internet should be kept on a very tight leash. Sarah Stock annoys me the most because the signaling is so trite and obvious.
But you overstate the delta. A lot of men basically fall into your woman box as well.
To rephrase my point, I think the delta is overstated and the true picture of "based thinking" is a couple of bell curves with a small area of overlap rather than an on-off switch.
Also the power of orthodoxy (patriarchal or otherwise) to mold women's thinking should not be overlooked. Imprinting is, in many cases, permanent.
If you're going with 100.00%, then why was Deborah a judge of Israel? And why was the fate of the Jewish race put in the hands of Esther?
I'd just like to take a moment to marvel at where things have taken us.
Lol, indeed
I would basically agree with everything you said. I'll also add that God still picks unlikely champions from time to time, although this is in no way a basis to overturn His natural order.
This EmilySavesAmerica chick is literally an openly pro gay pro abortion feminist
Generally agree but not sure it's fair to say 99.99%. What you're talking about is feminine nature. There's a ton of tomboyish less feminine women, just like there's a lot of faggy men, gay or not, who don't feel comfortable with others of their own sex. Those types of women are more often based or at least have logical takes and not the default Longhouse liberalism reinforced by hormones. They are a minority but we all know someone. ...So I'd say 97%.
(Though I've been mulling the idea over recently that the tomboys were the original proto-feminists. They were the types who legitimately wanted to wear pants and live in men's spaces before it was permitted. They weren't fighting for "women's rights" they literally just wanted to do not-girly stuff.)
Are they fighting over sourdough bread?
No they're fighting over the EmilySavesAmerica chick decrying stay at home mom's and demanding women be girl bosses. She shouldn't have any influence but the EmilySavesAmerica woman unfortunately has a decent amount of reach with right wing women so calling her out is important
Correct! We must revere the wisdom of the oldfags.
More like right wing women are pissed off that a leftjst larper attacked stay at home moms. You're minimizing the cultural attack on conservative values
probably jewish grifter, 99% guaranteed.