Well, he was claimed to be 5. But the source of that claim is—I believe—the alleged pedophile Somali man who was filming it. That man has a pair of children, who are nine and twelve, and so one hypothesis is that it was one of his children, not a five year old boy.
On the other hand, I’ve also heard some things that suggest this specific five year old boy does exist and is known as a problem.
Basically, there’s some doubt as to specific details, and Telia, being Telia, has immediately latched on to the most extreme possible version of events. Which might be the accurate one, but also might not.
The Somali who filmed it not only has kids of his own, but has been accused of kidnapping underage girls before. So, there's been multiple attempts made for why he was there, camera at the ready.
You always say you apologize if you were wrong, but you never actually take steps to minimize the chances that you’re wrong. As soon as you hear about anything that’s new to you, you immediately post the most extreme, nuance free, surface level, context free version of it that exists, with no disclaimers or considerations for what you don’t know or what might be inaccurate information.
Now, you’re often broadly correct, but your habit of rushing to go all in on everything does no one favors. For example, a very brief perusal of u/Mpetey123 ‘s user page would show he is in no way defending blacks.
I don't remember apologizing for something else i was supposedly wrong about?Also Mpetey123 whined about me saying that Metcelf shouldn't have forgiven his son's murderer and he whined about me "lying" about how the anti White Italian commercial inspired the anti black , Chinese commercial because he didn't read the article properly. Also it was definately not a 5 year old. https://x.com/Melissa_WongMT/status/1918368033334280695 so no i wasn't wrong. Turns out my "extreme" interpretation was correct
Look at this retard making shit up. Since I always do it, go ahead and prove it. If you can't, which you can't shut your faggot ass up. Pointing out you're a liar isn't a defense on blacks. You're a retard, pointing that out isn't a defense of black. You deflect, as usual, because you're stupid and your only arguments are you must be an X.
No I'm just tired of people like you being on my side.
He was 5 last I heard. Why are you lying?
Well, he was claimed to be 5. But the source of that claim is—I believe—the alleged pedophile Somali man who was filming it. That man has a pair of children, who are nine and twelve, and so one hypothesis is that it was one of his children, not a five year old boy.
On the other hand, I’ve also heard some things that suggest this specific five year old boy does exist and is known as a problem.
Basically, there’s some doubt as to specific details, and Telia, being Telia, has immediately latched on to the most extreme possible version of events. Which might be the accurate one, but also might not.
Things for pointing out the filmer had children there. I was wondering why he was there in the first place.
The Somali who filmed it not only has kids of his own, but has been accused of kidnapping underage girls before. So, there's been multiple attempts made for why he was there, camera at the ready.
He brought a 16yo girl who ran from home, to his place. She then accused him of ''cultural enrichment'', before recanting.
Why was this 30-something Somali bringing a 16yo girl on the run to his house? We can only speculate.
i heard that it was a 12 year old. I apologize if i was wrong
You always say you apologize if you were wrong, but you never actually take steps to minimize the chances that you’re wrong. As soon as you hear about anything that’s new to you, you immediately post the most extreme, nuance free, surface level, context free version of it that exists, with no disclaimers or considerations for what you don’t know or what might be inaccurate information.
Now, you’re often broadly correct, but your habit of rushing to go all in on everything does no one favors. For example, a very brief perusal of u/Mpetey123 ‘s user page would show he is in no way defending blacks.
I don't remember apologizing for something else i was supposedly wrong about?Also Mpetey123 whined about me saying that Metcelf shouldn't have forgiven his son's murderer and he whined about me "lying" about how the anti White Italian commercial inspired the anti black , Chinese commercial because he didn't read the article properly. Also it was definately not a 5 year old. https://x.com/Melissa_WongMT/status/1918368033334280695 so no i wasn't wrong. Turns out my "extreme" interpretation was correct
Uh huh
i looked it up . There's no way this is a 5 year old https://x.com/Melissa_WongMT/status/1918368033334280695
Yes, that fuzzy picture of the side of a kid proves your point. Fair play he does look big
You always come to the defense of blacks. Are you black or something?
Look at this retard making shit up. Since I always do it, go ahead and prove it. If you can't, which you can't shut your faggot ass up. Pointing out you're a liar isn't a defense on blacks. You're a retard, pointing that out isn't a defense of black. You deflect, as usual, because you're stupid and your only arguments are you must be an X.
No I'm just tired of people like you being on my side.