While I comprehend WHY anyone on this site, forced to the margin of discourse as we are, would be aggrieved by that position at first pass, I think you're reading a bit much into it. He's angry at the twitterati, much as we are.
stupid tradcuck takes
Okay, but that's hardly new. His viewpoint was always rooted in the old world of the 20th century consensus.
While I comprehend WHY anyone on this site, forced to the margin of discourse as we are, would be aggrieved by that position at first pass, I think you're reading a bit much into it.
"This goes against everything you stand for, but you're reading too much into it, bud."
He's angry at the twitterati, much as we are.
Not sure what exactly the "Twitterati" is, but whoever they are is afforded to the same free and anonymous speech as we are. Anyone who would say otherwise, or defend other people who are campaigning for the alternative, do not actually believe in free speech.
"He's angry," is not an excuse, if he's railing against everything we've always defended.
"This goes against everything you stand for, but you're reading too much into it, bud."
Anonymity is a means, not a end.
If god descended from on high and offered to strike down the SJWs and cultural marxists and regular marxists, to leave their ideology and all their works in ruins never to rise again, and the price was the loss of anonymity...
In what way could you possibly describe JP as "selling out"?
To the Daily Wire, evil, and Zionism; and against the disaffected male he championed for so long? Did you watch the video?
I admire much of what Peterson did, and will always defend him for his positive contributions, but he's a shadow of his former self. That was clear for quite some time, and his recent behavior isn't even novel.
Peterson is a sad joke at this point, and he's on the side of evil.
In what way could you possibly describe JP as "selling out"?
His crusade against online anonymity and stupid tradcuck takes come to mind.
While I comprehend WHY anyone on this site, forced to the margin of discourse as we are, would be aggrieved by that position at first pass, I think you're reading a bit much into it. He's angry at the twitterati, much as we are.
Okay, but that's hardly new. His viewpoint was always rooted in the old world of the 20th century consensus.
"This goes against everything you stand for, but you're reading too much into it, bud."
Not sure what exactly the "Twitterati" is, but whoever they are is afforded to the same free and anonymous speech as we are. Anyone who would say otherwise, or defend other people who are campaigning for the alternative, do not actually believe in free speech.
"He's angry," is not an excuse, if he's railing against everything we've always defended.
Anonymity is a means, not a end.
If god descended from on high and offered to strike down the SJWs and cultural marxists and regular marxists, to leave their ideology and all their works in ruins never to rise again, and the price was the loss of anonymity...
I'd make that deal.
Working for the Daily Wire.
To the Daily Wire, evil, and Zionism; and against the disaffected male he championed for so long? Did you watch the video?
I admire much of what Peterson did, and will always defend him for his positive contributions, but he's a shadow of his former self. That was clear for quite some time, and his recent behavior isn't even novel.
Peterson is a sad joke at this point, and he's on the side of evil.
Did you just come out of a coma? JP has been utterly converged.