With 100 people you could probably just dogpile the thing and render it immobile, if nothing else. You're imagining this animal like some high level video game monster, but that's not anything like how the real world actually works.
This is accurate. The gorilla will tire. It will disorient. It will suffer this and that minor wound. It will sprain its own ankle or wrist and the people will swarm it and eventually get it on the ground and through sheer mass hold it down and either bash it's skull into the ground or simply suffocate the beast. The loss of life for most races of men is minimal even. Catastrophic for others.
As the original guy on X said, technology has made people forget what humans are actually capable of. Animals might as well be mythical beasts when your only interactions with them are in video games or movies.
Our ancestors used to hunt antelope by just chasing the thing for days until it died of exhaustion, sorry, we are the inconceivable horrors.
And you are imagining it like 100 organized individuals attacking at once, thereby giving some sort of multiplicative boost. Its a gorilla, it can just swing its arm and fuck up a few of the guys in front of it and cause the entire "dogpile" to trip and stumble or be knocked back. And if it has its back to the wall that becomes a pretty hard tactic to make work.
Its also a gorilla. 500lbs of mostly muscle. That means you need a lot of guys at the same time to immobilize it rather than it being able to just buck people off or straight grab them off its body. Gorillas can lift 1800lbs on their own, so you need about 8-10 dudes at the same time to theoretically outweigh its strength. And that's best cased scenario.
Its not a high level boss monster. It just has distinct advantages that need to be actually overcome beyond "just do <incredibly hard task in the midst maximum chaos>" or "numerically we can do one damage to it until we deplete it!"
Like, your case about shoving the arm down the throat didn't kill the bear, it just made it run away scared because the gagging fucked it up. Unless there was a whole second case that wasn't the Chase Dellwo one. So that is irrelevant to this scenario of "100v1, no one leaves until dead" because you can't just scare the gorilla off, even if that would work in a real life scenario.
And you are imagining it like 100 organized individuals attacking at once, thereby giving some sort of multiplicative boost.
For whatever it's worth saying it online, I've actually spent a solid half of my life training in some form of the martial arts, culminating in MMA. My 'imagination' is built upon actually knowing the dynamics of hand to hand combat extremely well. This question is so wildly imbalanced in favour of the 100, it's basically serving as an IQ test. That gorilla wouldn't stand a ghost of a chance, and it's not at all debatable in any realistic way. You're trying to math things out here when you don't even know what it's like to be in a fight.
And when you run out of actual responses you fall back to "I've got over 300 confirmed kills, kiddo, and I bet you've never been in a fight and also you have a low IQ."
Got it, this super retarded hypothetical scenario is incredibly important to your ego somehow.
Like I said "for whatever it's worth." It really doesn't matter a lot, but the answer is so obvious there's no point in pretending that it's arguable any other way. Your post was particularly funny because it mocked people for using video game logic while you actually used it yourself.
With 100 people you could probably just dogpile the thing and render it immobile, if nothing else. You're imagining this animal like some high level video game monster, but that's not anything like how the real world actually works.
This is accurate. The gorilla will tire. It will disorient. It will suffer this and that minor wound. It will sprain its own ankle or wrist and the people will swarm it and eventually get it on the ground and through sheer mass hold it down and either bash it's skull into the ground or simply suffocate the beast. The loss of life for most races of men is minimal even. Catastrophic for others.
As the original guy on X said, technology has made people forget what humans are actually capable of. Animals might as well be mythical beasts when your only interactions with them are in video games or movies.
Our ancestors used to hunt antelope by just chasing the thing for days until it died of exhaustion, sorry, we are the inconceivable horrors.
And you are imagining it like 100 organized individuals attacking at once, thereby giving some sort of multiplicative boost. Its a gorilla, it can just swing its arm and fuck up a few of the guys in front of it and cause the entire "dogpile" to trip and stumble or be knocked back. And if it has its back to the wall that becomes a pretty hard tactic to make work.
Its also a gorilla. 500lbs of mostly muscle. That means you need a lot of guys at the same time to immobilize it rather than it being able to just buck people off or straight grab them off its body. Gorillas can lift 1800lbs on their own, so you need about 8-10 dudes at the same time to theoretically outweigh its strength. And that's best cased scenario.
Its not a high level boss monster. It just has distinct advantages that need to be actually overcome beyond "just do <incredibly hard task in the midst maximum chaos>" or "numerically we can do one damage to it until we deplete it!"
Like, your case about shoving the arm down the throat didn't kill the bear, it just made it run away scared because the gagging fucked it up. Unless there was a whole second case that wasn't the Chase Dellwo one. So that is irrelevant to this scenario of "100v1, no one leaves until dead" because you can't just scare the gorilla off, even if that would work in a real life scenario.
For whatever it's worth saying it online, I've actually spent a solid half of my life training in some form of the martial arts, culminating in MMA. My 'imagination' is built upon actually knowing the dynamics of hand to hand combat extremely well. This question is so wildly imbalanced in favour of the 100, it's basically serving as an IQ test. That gorilla wouldn't stand a ghost of a chance, and it's not at all debatable in any realistic way. You're trying to math things out here when you don't even know what it's like to be in a fight.
And when you run out of actual responses you fall back to "I've got over 300 confirmed kills, kiddo, and I bet you've never been in a fight and also you have a low IQ."
Got it, this super retarded hypothetical scenario is incredibly important to your ego somehow.
Like I said "for whatever it's worth." It really doesn't matter a lot, but the answer is so obvious there's no point in pretending that it's arguable any other way. Your post was particularly funny because it mocked people for using video game logic while you actually used it yourself.