And you are imagining it like 100 organized individuals attacking at once, thereby giving some sort of multiplicative boost.
For whatever it's worth saying it online, I've actually spent a solid half of my life training in some form of the martial arts, culminating in MMA. My 'imagination' is built upon actually knowing the dynamics of hand to hand combat extremely well. This question is so wildly imbalanced in favour of the 100, it's basically serving as an IQ test. That gorilla wouldn't stand a ghost of a chance, and it's not at all debatable in any realistic way. You're trying to math things out here when you don't even know what it's like to be in a fight.
And when you run out of actual responses you fall back to "I've got over 300 confirmed kills, kiddo, and I bet you've never been in a fight and also you have a low IQ."
Got it, this super retarded hypothetical scenario is incredibly important to your ego somehow.
Like I said "for whatever it's worth." It really doesn't matter a lot, but the answer is so obvious there's no point in pretending that it's arguable any other way. Your post was particularly funny because it mocked people for using video game logic while you actually used it yourself.
No it was mocking a specific form of video game logic, ie chip damage. Which is why my entire original post was "how will you really even hurt it?"
To which no one really gave an answer. You posted a very wrong story about a bear, and then leveraged fighting humans (who we can hurt with a punch) as some sort of instant gotcha.
Again, its a funny little hypothetical. You are the one that took it personally to preen about being a tough MMA guy and also high IQ when you ran out of responses.
It's never not funny to me when people insist they're getting under your skin through an online conversation. I don't think I'm even capable of getting upset about random strangers online anymore.
For whatever it's worth saying it online, I've actually spent a solid half of my life training in some form of the martial arts, culminating in MMA. My 'imagination' is built upon actually knowing the dynamics of hand to hand combat extremely well. This question is so wildly imbalanced in favour of the 100, it's basically serving as an IQ test. That gorilla wouldn't stand a ghost of a chance, and it's not at all debatable in any realistic way. You're trying to math things out here when you don't even know what it's like to be in a fight.
And when you run out of actual responses you fall back to "I've got over 300 confirmed kills, kiddo, and I bet you've never been in a fight and also you have a low IQ."
Got it, this super retarded hypothetical scenario is incredibly important to your ego somehow.
Like I said "for whatever it's worth." It really doesn't matter a lot, but the answer is so obvious there's no point in pretending that it's arguable any other way. Your post was particularly funny because it mocked people for using video game logic while you actually used it yourself.
No it was mocking a specific form of video game logic, ie chip damage. Which is why my entire original post was "how will you really even hurt it?"
To which no one really gave an answer. You posted a very wrong story about a bear, and then leveraged fighting humans (who we can hurt with a punch) as some sort of instant gotcha.
Again, its a funny little hypothetical. You are the one that took it personally to preen about being a tough MMA guy and also high IQ when you ran out of responses.
It's never not funny to me when people insist they're getting under your skin through an online conversation. I don't think I'm even capable of getting upset about random strangers online anymore.