I am, but my point doesn't rely on it. I only used it to say yours wasn't reliable.
And there is little evidence to be provided of opinions and beliefs. We are past the point of immigration being solvable civilly, which makes any poll of women's beliefs now useless. And Macron will won the majority of women's votes (against a literal woman) in the last election, meaning their actions are in support of continuing the problem regardless of the poll anyway.
Polls and elections are the best evidence we have of opinions and beliefs. They are better than nothing, which is what you've provide. I already said in another comment that Macron granted concessions on immigration.
Trump is in office with both houses of Congress, yet the deportation rate is anemic. Why is that? muh courts? They're only stopping his weird novelty deportations like sending people to Guantanamo or CECOT.
Polls and elections are the best evidence we have of opinions and beliefs.
Elections yes, polls not really. But good try putting them in the same sentence to consider them anywhere near the same.
Why is that?
Because he is attempting to do it civilly, which means a lot of retarded bureaucracy and slowness instead of hanging every illegal from a lightpost in the center of town. Which would probably be a pretty popular choice if he did it with a lot of younger men, and no one else.
Attempting to do it civilly? He is reveling in the uncivility of it all. He's live streaming arrests. He's sending people to Guantanamo Bay and CECOT. He's taunting specific people on the way out.
instead of hanging every illegal from a lightpost in the center of town. Which would probably be a pretty popular choice if he did it with a lot of younger men
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
ETA: You do realize that any discussion about how women vote is based on polling, do you not?
No, he is just being a prick about it. Civil has two definitions, one is polite and the other is in accordance with civil law. He is working well within the law, even if it requires using obscure ones, to do it. And that is slowing him down considerably, the need to justify himself.
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
Talking to them. Shockingly a very useful tool in learning about the world instead of burying your nose in news articles about polls they conducted. I also used the word "probably" to show that I had nothing to show you but my assumption, I pointed out to you earlier those little phrases/words are important.
I am, but my point doesn't rely on it. I only used it to say yours wasn't reliable.
And there is little evidence to be provided of opinions and beliefs. We are past the point of immigration being solvable civilly, which makes any poll of women's beliefs now useless. And Macron will won the majority of women's votes (against a literal woman) in the last election, meaning their actions are in support of continuing the problem regardless of the poll anyway.
Polls and elections are the best evidence we have of opinions and beliefs. They are better than nothing, which is what you've provide. I already said in another comment that Macron granted concessions on immigration.
Trump is in office with both houses of Congress, yet the deportation rate is anemic. Why is that? muh courts? They're only stopping his weird novelty deportations like sending people to Guantanamo or CECOT.
Elections yes, polls not really. But good try putting them in the same sentence to consider them anywhere near the same.
Because he is attempting to do it civilly, which means a lot of retarded bureaucracy and slowness instead of hanging every illegal from a lightpost in the center of town. Which would probably be a pretty popular choice if he did it with a lot of younger men, and no one else.
Attempting to do it civilly? He is reveling in the uncivility of it all. He's live streaming arrests. He's sending people to Guantanamo Bay and CECOT. He's taunting specific people on the way out.
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
ETA: You do realize that any discussion about how women vote is based on polling, do you not?
No, he is just being a prick about it. Civil has two definitions, one is polite and the other is in accordance with civil law. He is working well within the law, even if it requires using obscure ones, to do it. And that is slowing him down considerably, the need to justify himself.
Talking to them. Shockingly a very useful tool in learning about the world instead of burying your nose in news articles about polls they conducted. I also used the word "probably" to show that I had nothing to show you but my assumption, I pointed out to you earlier those little phrases/words are important.