Attempting to do it civilly? He is reveling in the uncivility of it all. He's live streaming arrests. He's sending people to Guantanamo Bay and CECOT. He's taunting specific people on the way out.
instead of hanging every illegal from a lightpost in the center of town. Which would probably be a pretty popular choice if he did it with a lot of younger men
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
ETA: You do realize that any discussion about how women vote is based on polling, do you not?
No, he is just being a prick about it. Civil has two definitions, one is polite and the other is in accordance with civil law. He is working well within the law, even if it requires using obscure ones, to do it. And that is slowing him down considerably, the need to justify himself.
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
Talking to them. Shockingly a very useful tool in learning about the world instead of burying your nose in news articles about polls they conducted. I also used the word "probably" to show that I had nothing to show you but my assumption, I pointed out to you earlier those little phrases/words are important.
I assumed based on context that you were claiming that women basically were squeamish about deporting because well, it's just kinda mean. You did cite the "kids in cages" bullshit after all. I guess I was mistaken. It appears you meant the other definition of civil, that women are just obsessed with following rules and procedures. I'm not sure what that has to do with the "kids in cages" shit or how it's slowing anything down when illegals in the country illegally are violating the law and as such can be deported. The only slow down is that they are entitled to due process, to prove they are actually illegal. I'm a bit surprised that you don't care about that, given your history.
I talk to people, too, and overwhelmingly, pro-immigration people make the economic arguments, not the bleeding heart ones. Anti-immigration people I talk to just want them deported, not rounded up and slaughtered. /shrug
I'm a bit surprised that you don't care about that, given your history.
I'm also a horrific racist, who is happy to just deport every Hispanic, Jeet, and other flavor of brown unless they can bring forth their own proof of legit citizenship. And that doesn't include loopholes like anchor babies and other "free" versions of it.
I do believe there should be some process to it, but I also think they are literal foreign agents operating on American soil against American interests. So they are on the same level as spies, terrorists and treason-ers, and deserve that level of scorn.
Part of that is they don't deserve due process because they are not American citizens, but foreign enemies, and thereby get no protection under American law. Proving their legal citizenship is not a hard process, as all of us are not only well tracked (thanks to government spying) but have a paper trail proving it. Whether that's birth certificate esque or the green card process.
overwhelmingly, pro-immigration people make the economic arguments
Then we live in very different circles. Not saying you are wrong, just my experience is the opposite, where pro-immigration arguments are overwhelmingly "RACISM" level from people who cannot understand high school economics.
Proving their legal citizenship is not a hard process
Exactly, so even under this shitty, multiracial, civic nationalist America, it still shouldn't be hard to deport illegals. That's the key thing.
Then we live in very different circles.
Probably, though I will say we have a history of mass deportations here the US, i.e. the Chinese Exclusion Act. Mass murder is generally a harder sell. Off topic, but you remind me of Jim Goad except I can't see him being into anime and whatnot.
Attempting to do it civilly? He is reveling in the uncivility of it all. He's live streaming arrests. He's sending people to Guantanamo Bay and CECOT. He's taunting specific people on the way out.
Where is your evidence that this would be popular with young men?
ETA: You do realize that any discussion about how women vote is based on polling, do you not?
No, he is just being a prick about it. Civil has two definitions, one is polite and the other is in accordance with civil law. He is working well within the law, even if it requires using obscure ones, to do it. And that is slowing him down considerably, the need to justify himself.
Talking to them. Shockingly a very useful tool in learning about the world instead of burying your nose in news articles about polls they conducted. I also used the word "probably" to show that I had nothing to show you but my assumption, I pointed out to you earlier those little phrases/words are important.
I assumed based on context that you were claiming that women basically were squeamish about deporting because well, it's just kinda mean. You did cite the "kids in cages" bullshit after all. I guess I was mistaken. It appears you meant the other definition of civil, that women are just obsessed with following rules and procedures. I'm not sure what that has to do with the "kids in cages" shit or how it's slowing anything down when illegals in the country illegally are violating the law and as such can be deported. The only slow down is that they are entitled to due process, to prove they are actually illegal. I'm a bit surprised that you don't care about that, given your history.
I talk to people, too, and overwhelmingly, pro-immigration people make the economic arguments, not the bleeding heart ones. Anti-immigration people I talk to just want them deported, not rounded up and slaughtered. /shrug
I'm also a horrific racist, who is happy to just deport every Hispanic, Jeet, and other flavor of brown unless they can bring forth their own proof of legit citizenship. And that doesn't include loopholes like anchor babies and other "free" versions of it.
I do believe there should be some process to it, but I also think they are literal foreign agents operating on American soil against American interests. So they are on the same level as spies, terrorists and treason-ers, and deserve that level of scorn.
Part of that is they don't deserve due process because they are not American citizens, but foreign enemies, and thereby get no protection under American law. Proving their legal citizenship is not a hard process, as all of us are not only well tracked (thanks to government spying) but have a paper trail proving it. Whether that's birth certificate esque or the green card process.
Then we live in very different circles. Not saying you are wrong, just my experience is the opposite, where pro-immigration arguments are overwhelmingly "RACISM" level from people who cannot understand high school economics.
Exactly, so even under this shitty, multiracial, civic nationalist America, it still shouldn't be hard to deport illegals. That's the key thing.
Probably, though I will say we have a history of mass deportations here the US, i.e. the Chinese Exclusion Act. Mass murder is generally a harder sell. Off topic, but you remind me of Jim Goad except I can't see him being into anime and whatnot.