I noticed the difference between the communities on Scored .
People at The Donald are mostly boomers. They are the oldest generation (if you say anything against boomers there they get upset) and also the most likely to be race blind and anti nazi and worship Trump . And they can't shut up about how Patriot Front are feds.
People on Kotakuinaction2 are mostly millenials who are muh about nazis somewhat and like Trump . And people here generally think Patriot front are feds but there is room for discussion over whether they might not be.
Whereas Conpro seem to have the youngest community (and they complain about boomers a lot) there are more zoomers there than in the other communities , and they are very pro nazi and don't like Trump because they see him as a jewish puppet. . And they believe Patriot Front is legit.
The younger right wingers are more racist than the older right wingers basically.. Which is kind of bizarre. I always thought that older people should be more angry about the state of affairs since they are the ones that know what things were like before, but actually its the younger people who become more extreme than the older people.
Reject that marxist framing my brother.
The boomers are the ones who sold us out and who benefit from the system that wont survive them. They made their money and got their positions, then brought in the shit. It takes an unusual amount of self awareness and humility to admit you were wrong. It's relatively easy to call out the errors when you don't have a chance of getting your own house.
So they're retarded. Shame.
Boomer blaming is stupid. Most people when they think of "boomers who sold us out" are thinking of someone like my parents age. Mid-60s. You know what my parents were doing during all that hippie Marxist revolution crap on college?
They were playing with toys because they were 5 years old.
The hippie boomer college kids in the 60s were born in the 40s and are now like 80 years old. And even then, who's to blame for selling the idea to naive college kids? They weren't the ones who held political office and made decisions...Then you gotta go and look at the Silent generation.....at that point, if you're having to go look for some generation born in 1910 or something, you've become like the black community looking for some past boogeyman to blame all your ills on, and it also doesn't allow for the fact that hindsight is 20/20.
In all time periods, nations trade with other nations. Tyre was a port city that was rich because it traded with other nations, as one example.
I think a lot of what was done in the past was done not realizing the full implications of what would happen because there was no way to know about certain things such as the internet. Before the internet, the globalization of culture wasn't a known threat. In the 80s we still had a national American culture despite the globalist trading that we were in, because money and goods may exchange hands, but American culture was insolated still.
When the internet came about, this globalization and mixed up way we were with all the nations became 100 times worse (that said the cultural problems the internet brought still would have been there to a degree even if we never had globalist economy because the internet can reach anyone, like the Tower of Babel). I think it's fair to give someone the benefit of the doubt who was born in 1915 that they didn't predict that starting in the 90s something called the internet would be invented when these people made their decisions.
And yeah, the people who started promoting cultural Marxism in the 60s weren't boomers, they were people who held office and were part of the Silent Generation. People pick up on the Boomer stuff because many in that generation fell for the kool-aid among that generation....yeah they were dumb college kids and a lot of what you believe in college forms you for life....Every generation falls for their respective lies. Not to mention, the liberal beliefs that people that age accepted then, were a bit different than what they morphed into. It was a trojan horse and the changes happened gradually enough that many in that age demographic didn't notice how the narrative shifted. So you're blaming that generation for accepting ideas they never accepted. The most you can fault that age demographic is not being hyper-vigilant to see the nice sounding ideas being twisted beyond recognition in subtle ways. It's the frog boiling in the pot analogy.
The only thing YOU can do, is
or
It'll become "It's Jews, it's boomers, it's the government, it's the silent generation, it's gen X, it's "insert group here"
The opposition doesn't care which group you make your whipping boy, as long as it accomplishes the goal of keeping you in a doomer "why even bother, I was cursed from the start" mindset.
Work on you, call out globalists by all means, but boomers are too vague and actually completely inaccurate.
Globalists exist in every generational group, every ethnicity, etc. That's why you can effectively call out them specifically. Even with Jews, the globalist anti-white Jews tend to be atheistic, pro-palestine, anti-zionist (think the ADL) yet they get lumped in wtih Orthodox, pro Israel Jews who tend to be more Conservative, support Trump, endorse American values, so this is why conflating the two does a lot of damage because supporting Israel is usually what CONSERVATIVE Jews do, like Sid Rosenberg who is a huge Trump supporter, while these atheistic leftist "jews in name only" try to distance themselves from "zion-ism" and intentionally conflate anti-globalism with anti-semitism, something the Orthodox Jews don't tend to do.
Globalism is simple. Do you support an atheistic idea of a utopian future where God is removed and all Biblical values are removed, and all nations are aligned with the world's systems values that are ultimately about subverting God's word and oppossing God? Then you're a globalist. Just go on Reddit to see millions of examples of globalists and they run the gamut of age and ethnicity.
Do you at the very least, support the general Biblical values and traditional decency even if you yourself are not a Christian, then congratulations, you're not a Globalist, and many Jews, especially Orthodox and pro Israel Jews fall into this category. It doesn't mean they're not going to go to hell and that they're not deceived, as only trusting in Christ saves you from God's wrath, but it means that they as human beings are people you'd be wise not to lump in the same category as globalists and conflate what atheistic Jews do, with what a large swath of what pro-Israel Jews do.
It's like conflating Thomas Sowell with the ghetto culture.
Except there's far more of an epidemic that is statistically alarming with the black community where people like Thomas Sowell are unfortunately anomalies.
With the Jews, it's far more of a split, where you have the small percentage of full woke leftist globalists who are totally atheistic, and the rest of the Jews running the gamut from average person (who are hard to predict their political beliefs like it would be hard to predict an Indian or Asians political beliefs) to very Orthodox (who tend to be more conservative).
The point is, neither Jew nor boomer are good targets and will just make sure you're missing the mark and being pulled slightly off target.
Just focus on the actions of globalism and you'll accurately call out the right target.....that being GLOBALISTS.
Don't aim for boomers and Jews and hope you hit the globalists as a side effect, just call out the globalists as that's your target.
Sid Rosenberg is an old Jew and he's Orthodox, pro America, pro-Trump, anti-globalism.
Chuck Schumer is an old Jew and he's atheistic, anti-America, anti-Trump, pro-globalism.
If I said "Jews and boomers are the problem", I'd be equally hitting Chuck Schumer and Sid Rosenberg with the same brush. [Sid Rosenberg being 58 is 3 years younger than a boomer, but most people would lump a late 50 year old in that category].
Whereas if I called out globalist beliefs and actions, I'd be rightly separating Sid Rosenberg and Chuck Schumer into two different categories and the message would not be confused.
ok boomer.
I'm 32
Don't trust anyone over 30!
At what point do you say a movement is legit ? Patriot Front reminds me of Germany's Brown Shirts and Japan's Tatenokai . Both of which were legit. So i dont see how Patriot Front would be different from them.
When they aren't receiving the police protection that legit groups and protests should be getting but don't. More legit groups either get trampled OR the police let them clash with the feral mob when outnumbered. Not patriot front though, the police escort them to their unmarked trucks.
When each time they get unmasked it doesn't end up being some aspiring-fed politics student or bullshit or a known fed,
When they don't look like they are fresh from that post justice for jan-6 entrapment thing.
Young white people are experiencing a society that is 60% or less white, and are not enjoying the experience. Young white men, in particular, are discriminated against in employment, college admission, and are constantly told they are the cause of inequality in the world.
Baby boomers grew un in a world that was 80% or more white, and their attitude reflects this.
Older people being angry about the state of affairs would require acknowledging their own guilt in allowing or even orchestrating how bad things are. The cognitive dissonance would kill them outright if they ever admitted that most of this shit show is directly their fault.
The younger generations are becoming progressively more extreme because each preceding generation's shift hasn't done enough to actually correct anything so you keep ratcheting things up until you hit 11 or shit's fixed. Gay Communism didn't work and neither did feeble attempts to reign it in so now all the kids want to line the Commies up against the wall to shoot them. When that doesn't work we might even see the real elephant in the room getting addressed and see some teenagers genuinely advocating for ethnic cleansing, it just remains to be seen which direction that ends up going.
Being extreme is literally one of the most common traits of young people in politics. They are young, full of energy and unsatisfied lust for both sex and power that gives them even more energy. They lack any roots in the world, so they can be fearless and shortsighted about every decision they make because they can just shrug off any consequences and see the world as this idealistic place where you can just "solve" problems.
Its why they historically were such a simple demographic for Liberal/Progressive politics, because they were the easiest to manipulate and whip into frenzies without a lot of critical thought beyond their emotional reaction.
This isn't a generational zoomer/boomer difference, its just how teens/young adults are and has been the case for all of human history. Its why they make the best soldiers, the best activists, and everything else people in power could ever want to exploit. They make up for lack of experience/knowledge with sheer gusto that is often enough to overpower most obstacles if under the right leadership.
All you've ever needed is a cause, a flame and then you have a wild fire. With all the pros and cons that can bring.
Not just that, but also ''judeo Christian'' values and ''Israel is our ally'' talking points. You also forgot the 1776 larpers, ''our constitution'', ''I will die for your right to say anything even if I disagree with it'', basically (((useful))) idiots.
The Donald have stopped with the "judeo christian values" and "israel is our allies" talking point to their credit.They get influenced from people from other communities on Scored so they are at least still a bit more based than the average boomer that you'd find on other sites
they are feds. when the proud boys beat the shit out of them, they unmasked many who were known agents.
Who? I'm legit curious since normally whenever those guys are in the news this site can't shut up about them, but I've never heard that incident. And of course, pointing out identified feds and being able to link a source would be the greatest argument against those guys, like how people attack the Proud Boys by pointing out that their leader is a federal informant.
There are people in there that are feds, for sure, but i don't think the group as a whole are feds. There upset way too many known actual zionist feds on The Donald to make me think they are feds.
there's more than a single kind of fed.
Yeah like Proud boys whose Afro Latino leader actually did work with the feds https://archive.md/My1N1
if Ruby ridge taught me anything, it's that feds don't communicate with each other. I have no illusions that the proud boys were anything but feds as well.
Every fed agency wants to be the hero and get a juicy budget increase.
Wrong re. control.
Younger generations have more to lose.
Conpro is a fed op. You are a faggot, and need to go back and stay in your containment board. All of the conpro vermin need to go back, you don't belong here, you have no understanding of the origin of this place. Nazis are not right wing, socialists are not right wing, the endless globalist operation to convince barely literate leftists that gay race communism is in their favor is an attack on the right, not a replacement for it.
TD has some boomers, but most of the pushback on retarded zoomer goblins going "reeeee BOOMERS" is because that's faggot bernie bro rhetoric from people who don't understand history or political reality that our government has been subverted for longer than boomers were alive.
Says the JIDF.
From the one note goblin with no relation to this board. Probably some spic in a basement pretending that being "white" makes his failure not his own fault, because you're too pathetic to be a fed. You might be a 10$ a day pajeet from a shitposting farm, but that would be giving you too much credit for not just being a duped commie piglet from the fedop board.
I don't care if you're a retarded tourist or a paid shill. You're vermin.