Boomer blaming is stupid. Most people when they think of "boomers who sold us out" are thinking of someone like my parents age. Mid-60s. You know what my parents were doing during all that hippie Marxist revolution crap on college?

They were playing with toys because they were 5 years old.

The hippie boomer college kids in the 60s were born in the 40s and are now like 80 years old. And even then, who's to blame for selling the idea to naive college kids? They weren't the ones who held political office and made decisions...Then you gotta go and look at the Silent generation.....at that point, if you're having to go look for some generation born in 1910 or something, you've become like the black community looking for some past boogeyman to blame all your ills on, and it also doesn't allow for the fact that hindsight is 20/20.

In all time periods, nations trade with other nations. Tyre was a port city that was rich because it traded with other nations, as one example.

I think a lot of what was done in the past was done not realizing the full implications of what would happen because there was no way to know about certain things such as the internet. Before the internet, the globalization of culture wasn't a known threat. In the 80s we still had a national American culture despite the globalist trading that we were in, because money and goods may exchange hands, but American culture was insolated still.

When the internet came about, this globalization and mixed up way we were with all the nations became 100 times worse (that said the cultural problems the internet brought still would have been there to a degree even if we never had globalist economy because the internet can reach anyone, like the Tower of Babel). I think it's fair to give someone the benefit of the doubt who was born in 1915 that they didn't predict that starting in the 90s something called the internet would be invented when these people made their decisions.

And yeah, the people who started promoting cultural Marxism in the 60s weren't boomers, they were people who held office and were part of the Silent Generation. People pick up on the Boomer stuff because many in that generation fell for the kool-aid among that generation....yeah they were dumb college kids and a lot of what you believe in college forms you for life....Every generation falls for their respective lies. Not to mention, the liberal beliefs that people that age accepted then, were a bit different than what they morphed into. It was a trojan horse and the changes happened gradually enough that many in that age demographic didn't notice how the narrative shifted. So you're blaming that generation for accepting ideas they never accepted. The most you can fault that age demographic is not being hyper-vigilant to see the nice sounding ideas being twisted beyond recognition in subtle ways. It's the frog boiling in the pot analogy.

The only thing YOU can do, is

1. Figure out how to invent a time machine and try to stop whoever you think started the problem (in which case your actual priority should be to stop the atheist scientists who came up with the lie of evolution and billions of years in the 1800s to undermine God's word)

or

2. Assuming you don't succeed in creating a time machine, you need to focus on YOU and YOUR generation and what's happening right NOW currently. Forget about what may or may have been done in the past, because all that will do is turn you into a perpetual victim, where instead of it being like the black community [It's systemic racism, it's the man, it's whitey, it's colonial mindset, it's the government screwing us over, it's slavery, it's jim crow]

It'll become "It's Jews, it's boomers, it's the government, it's the silent generation, it's gen X, it's "insert group here"

The opposition doesn't care which group you make your whipping boy, as long as it accomplishes the goal of keeping you in a doomer "why even bother, I was cursed from the start" mindset.

Work on you, call out globalists by all means, but boomers are too vague and actually completely inaccurate.

Globalists exist in every generational group, every ethnicity, etc. That's why you can effectively call out them specifically. Even with Jews, the globalist anti-white Jews tend to be atheistic, pro-palestine, anti-zionist (think the ADL) yet they get lumped in wtih Orthodox, pro Israel Jews who tend to be more Conservative, support Trump, endorse American values, so this is why conflating the two does a lot of damage because supporting Israel is usually what CONSERVATIVE Jews do, like Sid Rosenberg who is a huge Trump supporter, while these atheistic leftist "jews in name only" try to distance themselves from "zion-ism" and intentionally conflate anti-globalism with anti-semitism, something the Orthodox Jews don't tend to do.

Globalism is simple. Do you support an atheistic idea of a utopian future where God is removed and all Biblical values are removed, and all nations are aligned with the world's systems values that are ultimately about subverting God's word and oppossing God? Then you're a globalist. Just go on Reddit to see millions of examples of globalists and they run the gamut of age and ethnicity.

Do you at the very least, support the general Biblical values and traditional decency even if you yourself are not a Christian, then congratulations, you're not a Globalist, and many Jews, especially Orthodox and pro Israel Jews fall into this category. It doesn't mean they're not going to go to hell and that they're not deceived, as only trusting in Christ saves you from God's wrath, but it means that they as human beings are people you'd be wise not to lump in the same category as globalists and conflate what atheistic Jews do, with what a large swath of what pro-Israel Jews do.

It's like conflating Thomas Sowell with the ghetto culture.

Except there's far more of an epidemic that is statistically alarming with the black community where people like Thomas Sowell are unfortunately anomalies.

With the Jews, it's far more of a split, where you have the small percentage of full woke leftist globalists who are totally atheistic, and the rest of the Jews running the gamut from average person (who are hard to predict their political beliefs like it would be hard to predict an Indian or Asians political beliefs) to very Orthodox (who tend to be more conservative).

The point is, neither Jew nor boomer are good targets and will just make sure you're missing the mark and being pulled slightly off target.

Just focus on the actions of globalism and you'll accurately call out the right target.....that being GLOBALISTS.

Don't aim for boomers and Jews and hope you hit the globalists as a side effect, just call out the globalists as that's your target.

Sid Rosenberg is an old Jew and he's Orthodox, pro America, pro-Trump, anti-globalism.

Chuck Schumer is an old Jew and he's atheistic, anti-America, anti-Trump, pro-globalism.

If I said "Jews and boomers are the problem", I'd be equally hitting Chuck Schumer and Sid Rosenberg with the same brush. [Sid Rosenberg being 58 is 3 years younger than a boomer, but most people would lump a late 50 year old in that category].

Whereas if I called out globalist beliefs and actions, I'd be rightly separating Sid Rosenberg and Chuck Schumer into two different categories and the message would not be confused.