They can't actually show what was being shown, that's cognitohazardous information. By simply seeing those numbers, normal people become racist and there is no way to spin them well enough.
So it has to be treated as taboo words you cannot even see or hear, for your safety.
yup, gotta cover up uncomfortable truths at every turn. What's funny is how most people think the woke bullshit is new, but in the sciences, they've been covering up uncomfortable truths for decades, and even if they don't outright hide the data or slander the 60+ year old studies that didn't shy away from racial differences, not a single modern scientist is willing to address those differences honestly, as in they come from racial genetics.
False. When the Bell Curve came out, dozens of intelligence researchers signed an open letter backing up its accuracy. There is little to no controversy among the people who actually study the issue, as opposed to 'social scientists' who make up BS theories. Even someone like Turkheimer, who implausibly claims that differences in IQ are caused by... wait for it... slavery, does not deny that these difference s exist.
Pro tip: it's not online Nazis who persuaded even someone like Sam Harris that it is true that there are differences in IQ between various groups. It's just what "the science" says, in the real rather than the Fauci sense.
It's not exactly logical, because people don't really decide to get away with more, but it unfortunately does make sense.
Maybe also why radical blacks who try to get people to hate whites claim that whites are never shot by police, or that blacks have to work twice as hard to get half as far as white (something actually said).
It's not about people deciding to get away with more. It goes something like:
These people get away with more > they get away with more because they are held to lower standards > why are they held to lower standards? > they are held to lower standards because they are less capable.
That's why its a first step. First steps don't need to be logical, they need to be something that moves the object at rest into motion. And the best way to do that is make it something that might cause you harm or loss. Emotional reactions or shock of some kind.
They can't actually show what was being shown, that's cognitohazardous information. By simply seeing those numbers, normal people become racist and there is no way to spin them well enough.
So it has to be treated as taboo words you cannot even see or hear, for your safety.
Or, if we're going with the theme...cognigohazardous or, I suppose, cog***ohazardous.
Take your upvote and get out of my face you beautiful bastard.
You can't even call someone a paypig on the new CoD. The censorship has gone from simply out of control, to downright silly.
Remember what they took from us.
Can't go insulting people paying hundreds of dollars for awful skins.
yup, gotta cover up uncomfortable truths at every turn. What's funny is how most people think the woke bullshit is new, but in the sciences, they've been covering up uncomfortable truths for decades, and even if they don't outright hide the data or slander the 60+ year old studies that didn't shy away from racial differences, not a single modern scientist is willing to address those differences honestly, as in they come from racial genetics.
False. When the Bell Curve came out, dozens of intelligence researchers signed an open letter backing up its accuracy. There is little to no controversy among the people who actually study the issue, as opposed to 'social scientists' who make up BS theories. Even someone like Turkheimer, who implausibly claims that differences in IQ are caused by... wait for it... slavery, does not deny that these difference s exist.
Pro tip: it's not online Nazis who persuaded even someone like Sam Harris that it is true that there are differences in IQ between various groups. It's just what "the science" says, in the real rather than the Fauci sense.
Why would people become 'racist' because NYU is privileging blacks?
Because the first step to racism is never "there are worse than me" its usually always "they get away with more than me."
Its why something like anti-semitism hate speech laws create more Jew haters than probably 90% of stormfag efforts to convert.
It's not exactly logical, because people don't really decide to get away with more, but it unfortunately does make sense.
Maybe also why radical blacks who try to get people to hate whites claim that whites are never shot by police, or that blacks have to work twice as hard to get half as far as white (something actually said).
It's not about people deciding to get away with more. It goes something like:
These people get away with more > they get away with more because they are held to lower standards > why are they held to lower standards? > they are held to lower standards because they are less capable.
That's why its a first step. First steps don't need to be logical, they need to be something that moves the object at rest into motion. And the best way to do that is make it something that might cause you harm or loss. Emotional reactions or shock of some kind.