His “point” is that Tucker should say “white peoples” and “homelands”. But that’s not how gitz phrased it at all. Instead he used that small mistake in phrasing as justification to reiterate his belief that the category of “white” has no legitimate basis within this discourse. And that is an absolutely retarded and malicious assertion. Whites are grouped by their skin color by their aggressors. White peoples and nations are targeted specifically for their whiteness. Anyone who tries to tell you that white peoples and nations should not adopt racial solidarity in direct response to overtly racial attacks is a saboteur.
I deny that a category can have a homeland, not a person. Every person has a homeland. You're telling me I don't think an Asian person can have a homeland, when I'm telling you that a Korean has a homeland.
There's no inconsistency. You deny someone can have a homeland, you're antagonistic to that group.
You're missing his point entirely, while MattTheBlack understood it perfectly.
His “point” is that Tucker should say “white peoples” and “homelands”. But that’s not how gitz phrased it at all. Instead he used that small mistake in phrasing as justification to reiterate his belief that the category of “white” has no legitimate basis within this discourse. And that is an absolutely retarded and malicious assertion. Whites are grouped by their skin color by their aggressors. White peoples and nations are targeted specifically for their whiteness. Anyone who tries to tell you that white peoples and nations should not adopt racial solidarity in direct response to overtly racial attacks is a saboteur.
This I 100% agree with.
My problem is that you might not understand that that includes the White Nationalists.
Couldn't have put it better than this
I deny that a category can have a homeland, not a person. Every person has a homeland. You're telling me I don't think an Asian person can have a homeland, when I'm telling you that a Korean has a homeland.
Your entire argument can be solved with the addition of a couple “s”.
Pedantic malice.
Categories don't have ownership. People make a nation. The assertion of a nation does not make a people.
If it did, Transgender would be a legitimate nationality. Instead, it's a fake identity being propped up by the assertion of an identity group.