He is being pedantic to the point of disruption. White nations are being flooded with non-whites and their culture is being diversified and their history rewritten. This is happening in the homeland of many ethnic white nations. Instead of saying “It makes no sense that the Irish,French,German,English,Spanish, can’t have a homeland” Tucker just said white because non-retards will understand him.
And because that is a valid shared characteristic as defined by the people who are targeting us. They’ve locked us all in the same house and lit it on fire, but here comes gitz to make sure we understand that we have no common cause.
That's because you're being reductive with the concept of both "homeland' and "race".
There is no "white homeland" in the same way that a Black American doesn't have "his homeland in Africa", because he's not from Africa, nor could it ever be his home, nor does any race have a home, because races of people can exist in any place.
The Boer's homeland is in Africa. They are not European. They are White, but that doesn't mean their homeland is the Netherlands. Removing the Boer from Africa would be displacing them from their homeland. There is no single homeland for the Boer and the Irish. They are different people.
IIRC You're replying to someone who said you can't ever genocide white people because even if they became a super minority there would still be white people somewhere, and even they bred with other races and diluted their "whiteness" they would still be white because that's how races work or something so nbd. Tbf I haven't seen that he cares about other races either.
You accuse me of shit I said and did, not shit you wish I said and did. I've explicitly stated that whites in South Africa are almost being Genocided, and Rhodesians were Ethnically cleansed.
Unfuck yourself, and actually try listening to what I say before making shit up.
Not what I said. Topics were about the global White population in general, and the nature of mixed ethnic groups after replacement immigration and interbreeding. If I'm wrong I'll take your word on it cause I can't be arsed to go through 6 months of comments to check.
Jews are a religion, not a race, and are not even an ethnic group, let alone a nation. The "jewish homeland" has to be tied to religion first and foremost, but because it's religious it can change. They can claim that Jerusalem is their "homeland", but why? Because of the location of a specific temple. But why is it not Bagdad or Basra since much of the jewish religion was built there?.
But we can do this with Islam too. Why is Mecca and Medina an Islamic "homeland"? Well, because of specific events that took place there. But what about places absorbed by conflict? Is Iran not part of Islam? Looks like Spain isn't anymore.
Religions don't really have a homeland, but the nations under them may. And where that nation's homeland is depends on it's nation. This is because religion is a pure abstract concept. It isn't tied to a place as much as it's tied to a moral philosophy.
Edit - Did it, and you're still crying about it like I didn't.
White people don't have a homeland. Neither do Blacks or "Asians".
Ethnic groups have homelands though. And there are at least a dozen white ethnic homelands.
But there's no homeland where Albanians, Portuguese, Boers, and the Irish can call home because that's not how a "home" woks.
The Irish don't have a homeland? Huh?
He is being pedantic to the point of disruption. White nations are being flooded with non-whites and their culture is being diversified and their history rewritten. This is happening in the homeland of many ethnic white nations. Instead of saying “It makes no sense that the Irish,French,German,English,Spanish, can’t have a homeland” Tucker just said white because non-retards will understand him.
And because that is a valid shared characteristic as defined by the people who are targeting us. They’ve locked us all in the same house and lit it on fire, but here comes gitz to make sure we understand that we have no common cause.
The best response to Tony, giz, and ghost fox is really just “shut up jew”
The Irish Homeland is explicitly Ireland.
There's no such thing as a homeland for the Irish and the Albanians at the same time, in the same place.
That was confusingly worded
Deliberately so.
He’s also completely incorrect.
That's because you're being reductive with the concept of both "homeland' and "race".
There is no "white homeland" in the same way that a Black American doesn't have "his homeland in Africa", because he's not from Africa, nor could it ever be his home, nor does any race have a home, because races of people can exist in any place.
The Boer's homeland is in Africa. They are not European. They are White, but that doesn't mean their homeland is the Netherlands. Removing the Boer from Africa would be displacing them from their homeland. There is no single homeland for the Boer and the Irish. They are different people.
I think he means that white countries/homelands are expected to import brown immigrants until they are no longer white countries.
IIRC You're replying to someone who said you can't ever genocide white people because even if they became a super minority there would still be white people somewhere, and even they bred with other races and diluted their "whiteness" they would still be white because that's how races work or something so nbd. Tbf I haven't seen that he cares about other races either.
STOP RIGHT THERE FAGGOT.
You accuse me of shit I said and did, not shit you wish I said and did. I've explicitly stated that whites in South Africa are almost being Genocided, and Rhodesians were Ethnically cleansed.
Unfuck yourself, and actually try listening to what I say before making shit up.
Not what I said. Topics were about the global White population in general, and the nature of mixed ethnic groups after replacement immigration and interbreeding. If I'm wrong I'll take your word on it cause I can't be arsed to go through 6 months of comments to check.
That's obvious.
Now do Jews.
Jews are a religion, not a race, and are not even an ethnic group, let alone a nation. The "jewish homeland" has to be tied to religion first and foremost, but because it's religious it can change. They can claim that Jerusalem is their "homeland", but why? Because of the location of a specific temple. But why is it not Bagdad or Basra since much of the jewish religion was built there?.
But we can do this with Islam too. Why is Mecca and Medina an Islamic "homeland"? Well, because of specific events that took place there. But what about places absorbed by conflict? Is Iran not part of Islam? Looks like Spain isn't anymore.
Religions don't really have a homeland, but the nations under them may. And where that nation's homeland is depends on it's nation. This is because religion is a pure abstract concept. It isn't tied to a place as much as it's tied to a moral philosophy.
Edit - Did it, and you're still crying about it like I didn't.
Ivanka Trump and Woody Allen.
Christian is a religion, not an ethnicity. Like John Adams.
Yes. These people have a religion.
And you claim you aren't anti-White.
Nothing I've said is anti-white. There are no racial homelands for anyone. Am I anti-Asian by my same statement?
If the context of the conversation had been regarding Asian homelands then yes.
What the hell's the difference???