Why is the go-to "anti-Stormfag" argument so often to act like an absolute retard? I get you don't like them. But there's got to be a better rebuttal than...this.
I'll give you an answer as someone who has been on both sides of this "argument" with our local extremists.
Its because both sides are incapable of talking to one another, so they just end up talking at each other until it just devolves into gayly trolling the other side. Its just insane accusations, memes, and posting single factors as if they make the entire argument for you. Its not inherent to only one side, but one side is more "accepted" here than the other, so that one seems less retarded to most people even when it itself is being retarded. The inverse of how it is in the mainstream.
I'm not saying its right to debase yourself to this level of discourse, because it truly does accomplish nothing. But if you will get the same "lol you sound like a Jew" response either way, its probably a lot less effort and time to post retarded nonsense than detailed breakdowns that won't get responded to anyway.
But that's also probably too serious of an answer to your question when most people probably want "its because only retards aren't anti-Jew!"
Critical Theory literally says that objective truth is whatever helps to bring about critical change in society, moving it towards the Socialist ideal.
Yes. You heard me. The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of socialism.
The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of X
That just describes most arguments online period.
I got called a child on this very forum last week or so for saying "you need to be able to sell your position to normies to make actual change." After saying you need to be able to actually explain your position instead of sperging out and screaming it.
Critical Theory is the internationally organized version of it by the Jews for their specific nonsense, but people are plenty capable of becoming that for their own beliefs all on their own.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" is what makes us not only always on the backfoot against said Jews, but makes us stupider in general. On top of being a literal Leftist version of thinking.
The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of X
That just describes most arguments online period.
No. Are you deliberately misunderstanding me? I'll try again; with an example.
In this example you are discussing the importance of history as a school subject. You think teaching history is very important. We should learn from the past.
The Neo Marxist teacher will say anything at all about history so they can get in front of your kids and teach them Critical Race Theory in what they refer to as praxis; That is the practice of advancing CRT through indoctrination of the youth.
You later work out that the Neo Marxist teacher is teaching history through the leans of Critical Race Theory. You confront them. They just fucking lie. It now devolves into he-said-she said shit, and the teacher knows they can get away with it, because their school principle is also a Neo Marxist.
The Neo Marxist teacher is convinced that they told the truth at all times; more importantly, they are morally correct to have acted this way. No matter how persuasive or objective your words, they can not affect her.
Far fetched, you say? This literally happened to me with my child's fourth grade class.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" ...
Okay. Cool. If you say so. Again, you missed the specific point I made.
In this case I am laying out that Neo Marxists, by reasonable standards, do not believe that there is objective truth and they act accordingly. I will provide receipts if you want them.
I'll give you an answer as someone who has been on both sides of this "argument" with our local extremists.
Good place to be, honestly. I got called both a Nazi and zioshill just recently. Both types of accusers were wrong and retarded.
Its not inherent to only one side, but one side is more "accepted" here than the other, so that one seems less retarded to most people even when it itself is being retarded. The inverse of how it is in the mainstream.
Good point.
But if you will get the same "lol you sound like a Jew" response either way, its probably a lot less effort and time to post retarded nonsense than detailed breakdowns that won't get responded to anyway.
Yeah, it's often an incredibly pointless effort, since everyone has made up their mind. I've never been called a Jew, and I generally leave my rebuttals against the "Stormfag" side of things at "do your fucking research, you're just freaking wrong," and explain how. OP is a good example; I find myself arguing on both sides pretty often, where he's concerned. He posts a lot of absolute bullshit, and I call him out on that. And then he also posts just normal shit and draws a ton of ire from the other side because they don't like his other opinions, so I end up defending him.
But that's also probably too serious of an answer to your question when most people probably want "its because only retards aren't anti-Jew!"
"No, no, only retards are anti-Jew, Stormfag!" (Joke, obviously.) But it is hilarious how it is such a purity spiral on both sides. If you don't think the Jews are to blame for everything you're a Zionist cuck, but on the other side if you think there's anything to question about Jews, Zionism, or Israel, you're a Stormfag retard who is clearly obsessed and wants to genocide all Jews.
But it is hilarious how it is such a purity spiral on both sides.
That's really all it is. Both are caught up trying to make sure you know they really hate the other side, that they are lost in the sauce.
And that would be fine too, if it wasn't so boring. Its either the same old tired lines repeated forever, or super serious battle lines where you must agree with them wholeheartedly or you are the enemy.
This is mockery and it is effective despite how it makes me look.
I'd rather be a fool who is loud and nonsensical to most than a fool who allows idiots to hijack a situation that has been piggy-backed in collaboration with those against us.
I've never once said I don't like stormfags. Any slurs assumed have been by others.
This is mockery and it is effective despite how it makes me look.
I'd rather be a fool who is loud and nonsensical to most than a fool who allows idiots to hijack a situation that has been piggy-backed in collaboration with those against us.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand your autism. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of advanced internet retardation most of the jokes will go over a typical reader's head.
I've never once said I don't like stormfags. Any slurs assumed have been by others.
Uh. That's not the point. At all. And, of course "stormFAG" is a slur (and that's fine), and people who use it don't like them. This is so stupid.
I still don't get this argument style.
Why is the go-to "anti-Stormfag" argument so often to act like an absolute retard? I get you don't like them. But there's got to be a better rebuttal than...this.
act?
I'll give you an answer as someone who has been on both sides of this "argument" with our local extremists.
Its because both sides are incapable of talking to one another, so they just end up talking at each other until it just devolves into gayly trolling the other side. Its just insane accusations, memes, and posting single factors as if they make the entire argument for you. Its not inherent to only one side, but one side is more "accepted" here than the other, so that one seems less retarded to most people even when it itself is being retarded. The inverse of how it is in the mainstream.
I'm not saying its right to debase yourself to this level of discourse, because it truly does accomplish nothing. But if you will get the same "lol you sound like a Jew" response either way, its probably a lot less effort and time to post retarded nonsense than detailed breakdowns that won't get responded to anyway.
But that's also probably too serious of an answer to your question when most people probably want "its because only retards aren't anti-Jew!"
Critical Theory literally says that objective truth is whatever helps to bring about critical change in society, moving it towards the Socialist ideal.
Yes. You heard me. The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of socialism.
You can't actually talk to someone like that.
That just describes most arguments online period.
I got called a child on this very forum last week or so for saying "you need to be able to sell your position to normies to make actual change." After saying you need to be able to actually explain your position instead of sperging out and screaming it.
Critical Theory is the internationally organized version of it by the Jews for their specific nonsense, but people are plenty capable of becoming that for their own beliefs all on their own.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" is what makes us not only always on the backfoot against said Jews, but makes us stupider in general. On top of being a literal Leftist version of thinking.
No. Are you deliberately misunderstanding me? I'll try again; with an example.
In this example you are discussing the importance of history as a school subject. You think teaching history is very important. We should learn from the past.
The Neo Marxist teacher will say anything at all about history so they can get in front of your kids and teach them Critical Race Theory in what they refer to as praxis; That is the practice of advancing CRT through indoctrination of the youth.
You later work out that the Neo Marxist teacher is teaching history through the leans of Critical Race Theory. You confront them. They just fucking lie. It now devolves into he-said-she said shit, and the teacher knows they can get away with it, because their school principle is also a Neo Marxist.
The Neo Marxist teacher is convinced that they told the truth at all times; more importantly, they are morally correct to have acted this way. No matter how persuasive or objective your words, they can not affect her.
Far fetched, you say? This literally happened to me with my child's fourth grade class.
Okay. Cool. If you say so. Again, you missed the specific point I made.
In this case I am laying out that Neo Marxists, by reasonable standards, do not believe that there is objective truth and they act accordingly. I will provide receipts if you want them.
Good place to be, honestly. I got called both a Nazi and zioshill just recently. Both types of accusers were wrong and retarded.
Good point.
Yeah, it's often an incredibly pointless effort, since everyone has made up their mind. I've never been called a Jew, and I generally leave my rebuttals against the "Stormfag" side of things at "do your fucking research, you're just freaking wrong," and explain how. OP is a good example; I find myself arguing on both sides pretty often, where he's concerned. He posts a lot of absolute bullshit, and I call him out on that. And then he also posts just normal shit and draws a ton of ire from the other side because they don't like his other opinions, so I end up defending him.
"No, no, only retards are anti-Jew, Stormfag!" (Joke, obviously.) But it is hilarious how it is such a purity spiral on both sides. If you don't think the Jews are to blame for everything you're a Zionist cuck, but on the other side if you think there's anything to question about Jews, Zionism, or Israel, you're a Stormfag retard who is clearly obsessed and wants to genocide all Jews.
That's really all it is. Both are caught up trying to make sure you know they really hate the other side, that they are lost in the sauce.
And that would be fine too, if it wasn't so boring. Its either the same old tired lines repeated forever, or super serious battle lines where you must agree with them wholeheartedly or you are the enemy.
The ultimate rebuttal has already been done.
This is mockery and it is effective despite how it makes me look.
I'd rather be a fool who is loud and nonsensical to most than a fool who allows idiots to hijack a situation that has been piggy-backed in collaboration with those against us.
I've never once said I don't like stormfags. Any slurs assumed have been by others.
No it isn't.
Please, for the love of God, understand this.
OK, OK.
Israel is dividing the West so that it may conquer the world via Russia and China.
You happy now?!?
Genuine question: how would you feel if you hadn't been a retard in your last post?
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand your autism. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of advanced internet retardation most of the jokes will go over a typical reader's head.
Uh. That's not the point. At all. And, of course "stormFAG" is a slur (and that's fine), and people who use it don't like them. This is so stupid.
I know more than a few stormfags who enjoy being known as stormfags.
They've told me that you can't take that word away from them and they use it as a badge of honour.