The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of X
That just describes most arguments online period.
I got called a child on this very forum last week or so for saying "you need to be able to sell your position to normies to make actual change." After saying you need to be able to actually explain your position instead of sperging out and screaming it.
Critical Theory is the internationally organized version of it by the Jews for their specific nonsense, but people are plenty capable of becoming that for their own beliefs all on their own.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" is what makes us not only always on the backfoot against said Jews, but makes us stupider in general. On top of being a literal Leftist version of thinking.
The only value for arguments or description is to promote acceptance of X
That just describes most arguments online period.
No. Are you deliberately misunderstanding me? I'll try again; with an example.
In this example you are discussing the importance of history as a school subject. You think teaching history is very important. We should learn from the past.
The Neo Marxist teacher will say anything at all about history so they can get in front of your kids and teach them Critical Race Theory in what they refer to as praxis; That is the practice of advancing CRT through indoctrination of the youth.
You later work out that the Neo Marxist teacher is teaching history through the leans of Critical Race Theory. You confront them. They just fucking lie. It now devolves into he-said-she said shit, and the teacher knows they can get away with it, because their school principle is also a Neo Marxist.
The Neo Marxist teacher is convinced that they told the truth at all times; more importantly, they are morally correct to have acted this way. No matter how persuasive or objective your words, they can not affect her.
Far fetched, you say? This literally happened to me with my child's fourth grade class.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" ...
Okay. Cool. If you say so. Again, you missed the specific point I made.
In this case I am laying out that Neo Marxists, by reasonable standards, do not believe that there is objective truth and they act accordingly. I will provide receipts if you want them.
Your point was obvious, so obvious that it didn't need any further acknowledgement because we all know it and agree on it for the most part.
I responded to it in the context of it being a response to what I said originally and expanded from my original point, as I assumed that it was a genuine response.
But instead it seems like you just needed to vent something from your life because you were angry about it and are just trying to jam it into a conversation. So I hope you feel better, my nigga.
That just describes most arguments online period.
I got called a child on this very forum last week or so for saying "you need to be able to sell your position to normies to make actual change." After saying you need to be able to actually explain your position instead of sperging out and screaming it.
Critical Theory is the internationally organized version of it by the Jews for their specific nonsense, but people are plenty capable of becoming that for their own beliefs all on their own.
I dare say thinking "only the bad guys are capable of such errors and biases, I'm in the right so I cannot fall for such traps" is what makes us not only always on the backfoot against said Jews, but makes us stupider in general. On top of being a literal Leftist version of thinking.
No. Are you deliberately misunderstanding me? I'll try again; with an example.
In this example you are discussing the importance of history as a school subject. You think teaching history is very important. We should learn from the past.
The Neo Marxist teacher will say anything at all about history so they can get in front of your kids and teach them Critical Race Theory in what they refer to as praxis; That is the practice of advancing CRT through indoctrination of the youth.
You later work out that the Neo Marxist teacher is teaching history through the leans of Critical Race Theory. You confront them. They just fucking lie. It now devolves into he-said-she said shit, and the teacher knows they can get away with it, because their school principle is also a Neo Marxist.
The Neo Marxist teacher is convinced that they told the truth at all times; more importantly, they are morally correct to have acted this way. No matter how persuasive or objective your words, they can not affect her.
Far fetched, you say? This literally happened to me with my child's fourth grade class.
Okay. Cool. If you say so. Again, you missed the specific point I made.
In this case I am laying out that Neo Marxists, by reasonable standards, do not believe that there is objective truth and they act accordingly. I will provide receipts if you want them.
Your point was obvious, so obvious that it didn't need any further acknowledgement because we all know it and agree on it for the most part.
I responded to it in the context of it being a response to what I said originally and expanded from my original point, as I assumed that it was a genuine response.
But instead it seems like you just needed to vent something from your life because you were angry about it and are just trying to jam it into a conversation. So I hope you feel better, my nigga.