It would be much more difficult, because they'd have to make up a constitutional provision that mandates DEI, as oppposed to saying that the EO is not based on the law. And I don't think the Supreme Court that just threw out affirmative action 6-3 would do that. Some potential applications might - this might fall under a student's free speech - but not the thing as a whole.
IMHO a student has an unfettered right to post xir asinine pronouns if the platform allows it. The proper remedy in this case is to remove the pronoun field codes from the platform. ASU is in the wrong here, not any student who fails to take action. This is what happens when you try to keep pace with the leftist insanity game, you eventually will be made to look like the idiot you are.
It can also be blocked by the courts.
"You made your ruling. Let's see you enforce it."
Andrew Jackson, one of Donald Trump's heroes
He said that? What a man
It would be much more difficult, because they'd have to make up a constitutional provision that mandates DEI, as oppposed to saying that the EO is not based on the law. And I don't think the Supreme Court that just threw out affirmative action 6-3 would do that. Some potential applications might - this might fall under a student's free speech - but not the thing as a whole.
IMHO a student has an unfettered right to post xir asinine pronouns if the platform allows it. The proper remedy in this case is to remove the pronoun field codes from the platform. ASU is in the wrong here, not any student who fails to take action. This is what happens when you try to keep pace with the leftist insanity game, you eventually will be made to look like the idiot you are.