It's very vague with its 'for the purposes of this act', at least for someone not familiar with NZ 'law'. But my guess is that this is for submissions to the government for the approval of a given medicine, like the documents you sign with "I certify that all this is true under penalty of perjury".
By all means, take more boosters if you want to advocate for the gov so much. The government never properly confirmed the vaccines were faulty instead of twisting your brain to pretzel to justify your stance that you are going to continue splitting the hair. After all, the rumour of vaccines being harmful is just right wing conspiracy theory, isn't it?
The original guy you were replying to were talking about injection and you suddenly become a lawyer by literally reading from a paper even most politicians don't really follow to the letter. Don't even need to be a psychic to tell you are a slippery debater that will pull every tricks in the book to justify your stance. I mean seriously take the booster since government never denied the vaccine was faulty. If you believe in the government so much, that's the least you could do instead of being a slimy duplicitous faggot.
It's very vague with its 'for the purposes of this act', at least for someone not familiar with NZ 'law'. But my guess is that this is for submissions to the government for the approval of a given medicine, like the documents you sign with "I certify that all this is true under penalty of perjury".
Buddy, did you not see how AUS/ NZ handled themselves during the lockdowns?
You're giving them far too much credit than they deserve. These are confirmed tyrannical regimes.
Where am I giving them credit? I'm just looking at the law.
By all means, take more boosters if you want to advocate for the gov so much. The government never properly confirmed the vaccines were faulty instead of twisting your brain to pretzel to justify your stance that you are going to continue splitting the hair. After all, the rumour of vaccines being harmful is just right wing conspiracy theory, isn't it?
You got all that from "you're misreading what this law says"?
You should sell your ESP skills at country fairs, you will easily become a millionaire.
The original guy you were replying to were talking about injection and you suddenly become a lawyer by literally reading from a paper even most politicians don't really follow to the letter. Don't even need to be a psychic to tell you are a slippery debater that will pull every tricks in the book to justify your stance. I mean seriously take the booster since government never denied the vaccine was faulty. If you believe in the government so much, that's the least you could do instead of being a slimy duplicitous faggot.
You're just ranting now. Reading from a paper? I referred to the law that the OP link claims forces vaccines and restricts free speech.