And the paper which is just a general guideline related to the medicine approved by the govetrnement and you doing that is you trying to larp as armchair lawyer as if we give a shit about the laws now. I mean if it takes you to quit being annoying karen about it.
What's more? Me being in Australia means, it's going to eventually affect my country, too, I have more reasons to give a shit about what NZ does. You? Where even are you? When you are going to advocate for shit that doesn't even concern you, I got every right to be infuriated by your nonchalant dipshit response.
You're just ranting now. Reading from a paper? I referred to the law that the OP link claims forces vaccines and restricts free speech.
And the paper which is just a general guideline related to the medicine approved by the govetrnement and you doing that is you trying to larp as armchair lawyer as if we give a shit about the laws now. I mean if it takes you to quit being annoying karen about it.
What's more? Me being in Australia means, it's going to eventually affect my country, too, I have more reasons to give a shit about what NZ does. You? Where even are you? When you are going to advocate for shit that doesn't even concern you, I got every right to be infuriated by your nonchalant dipshit response.
So your response is: "I'm angry, don't tell me that what I'm angry about is just not true, because i want to be angry."
If you're claiming that THIS LAW does X and Y, it's relevant whether this law does X or Y.
Maybe it won't because this is BS. There's plenty of real stuff in Australia to get angry about, like those charming Covid internment camps.