One of the core requirements for society to exist, for humanity to exist, for men and women to be able to pass on their genetics, is to protect our children. The instinct is so strong, because it must be. What benefit is it to society to drop the heaviest hammer imaginable on child predators, on pedophiles, on child porn enjoyed, even if it's AI, is that we can't allow that line to be crossed one inch, and every person who partakes in it must be destroyed, without remorse.
I couldn't care less if the child porn they watch is AI generated. The very fact that they're sexually attracted to kids is an abomination, and must be destroyed. Do not tolerate evil. Destroy it.
You're actively defending pedophiles, people with an aberrant and extremely dangerous mentality. And the reason for your defense of them? Tolerance, and some amorphous concept of "freedom", which you place as the highest virtue, with zero exceptions or requisite responsibilities.
Pedophiles should not, nor ever, be encouraged to just "watch child porn at home" for the "betterment of society", so they don't harm kids in real life. Pedophiles should be executed. Any tendency to pedophilia should be rooted out. Being attracted to kids is an aberration. It does not occur naturally, as there is zero biological reason for it to exist. It only occurs due to rampant porn consumption, free and abundant availability of porn, open degeneracy in society, acceptance of gays, acceptance of hedonism as virtuous, and a never ending pursuit of increasing dopamine hits to assuage the addled minds of the increasingly hedonistic public, inevitably resulting in increasingly degenerate and evil "pleasures" to satisfy that dopamine hit. There's a direct correlation to what's been happening to Western civilization. Even a blind man can see it. Our ancestors didn't need to draw cartoons of child porn to placate the pedophiles that existed in their day, prior to TV, the internet, and freely available porn. Why must we make fictional child porn to placate pedophiles today?
But, you filth defend it. I'm utterly repulsed by the vote totals in this thread.
The benefit to society?
One of the core requirements for society to exist, for humanity to exist, for men and women to be able to pass on their genetics, is to protect our children. The instinct is so strong, because it must be. What benefit is it to society to drop the heaviest hammer imaginable on child predators, on pedophiles, on child porn enjoyed, even if it's AI, is that we can't allow that line to be crossed one inch, and every person who partakes in it must be destroyed, without remorse.
I couldn't care less if the child porn they watch is AI generated. The very fact that they're sexually attracted to kids is an abomination, and must be destroyed. Do not tolerate evil. Destroy it.
Yeah we should scare pedos away from generating fake child porn on PAIN OF DEATH so they are instead encouraged to wife up and have kids of their own!
You people disgust me.
You're actively defending pedophiles, people with an aberrant and extremely dangerous mentality. And the reason for your defense of them? Tolerance, and some amorphous concept of "freedom", which you place as the highest virtue, with zero exceptions or requisite responsibilities.
Pedophiles should not, nor ever, be encouraged to just "watch child porn at home" for the "betterment of society", so they don't harm kids in real life. Pedophiles should be executed. Any tendency to pedophilia should be rooted out. Being attracted to kids is an aberration. It does not occur naturally, as there is zero biological reason for it to exist. It only occurs due to rampant porn consumption, free and abundant availability of porn, open degeneracy in society, acceptance of gays, acceptance of hedonism as virtuous, and a never ending pursuit of increasing dopamine hits to assuage the addled minds of the increasingly hedonistic public, inevitably resulting in increasingly degenerate and evil "pleasures" to satisfy that dopamine hit. There's a direct correlation to what's been happening to Western civilization. Even a blind man can see it. Our ancestors didn't need to draw cartoons of child porn to placate the pedophiles that existed in their day, prior to TV, the internet, and freely available porn. Why must we make fictional child porn to placate pedophiles today?
But, you filth defend it. I'm utterly repulsed by the vote totals in this thread.
Very based.