hell, I remember people calling fucking Ben Shapiro a Nazi. Imagine seeing an obviously Jewish person who wears a kippah to work and thinking "that is a person who is a national socialist and wants to exterminate Jews".
Konstantin Kisin is a member of the tribe, he will use any moral argument he can to destroy critics of Jewish advocacy.
James Lindsey is just demonstrating his academic biases when he uses it, and since he's the originator, I think he is allowing his deep dive into collectivist thinking to contaminate his thinking here.
I'm not watching the guy's channel but from the description he seems to be saying that being a reactionary against marxism/leftism is just as bad as marxism/leftism which is nonsense.
Probably people that realise the left is on the eve of their death cult phase and going to lose all legitimacy everywhere soon but enjoy the tactics of leftists so what to hop onto the 'right' while still using the same tactics.
A key indicator is their language mostly as they aren't willing to call a retard a retard, always have to fluffy it up and I only do that around kids and people who pay me, not 24/7.
he's the biggest defender of White people on mainstream TV AND he doesn't openly over the top simp for israel unlike other mainstream "right wing" TV pundents. . So he gets more attention from people who hate people who speak for White interests.
in this day and age , even defending White people specifically from White hatred is speaking up for White interests. What other mainstream TV pundent does that?
with the overtone window where it is, normality and white interests both go in the same direction. if the window shifts back, the divergence would be noticeable.
I think it's a mistake to pretend that Tucker is somehow making radical demands, rather than the very normal demand that white people be treated fairly.
I don't think he's making radical statements. I think he's pushing return to normalcy which happens to also serve white interests. Once whites are no longer discriminated against, I don't think he'd push further.
It's a divide and conquer strategy. It's only natural that we don't align on everything all the time. what's important is that we oppose the elite agenda to take away our right to free speech, free assembly, self-defense, and general autonomy.
Who are the main agents or influencers leading the "divide and conquer" strategy? Is it these liberals or members of the "woke right" they are calling out?
The thing is, Elon's sperg session started with specific instigators, primarily Laura Loomer. Is she leading a psy-op the divide and conquer the Right? I'm skeptical that such a thing is having an effect. It's mostly organic.
I still like that they even call people like Dave Smith (Jewish libertarian) a Nazi and "woke" because he doesn't like what Israel is doing.
hell, I remember people calling fucking Ben Shapiro a Nazi. Imagine seeing an obviously Jewish person who wears a kippah to work and thinking "that is a person who is a national socialist and wants to exterminate Jews".
If he did, Biden would give him a Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Konstantin Kisin is a member of the tribe, he will use any moral argument he can to destroy critics of Jewish advocacy.
James Lindsey is just demonstrating his academic biases when he uses it, and since he's the originator, I think he is allowing his deep dive into collectivist thinking to contaminate his thinking here.
I'm not watching the guy's channel but from the description he seems to be saying that being a reactionary against marxism/leftism is just as bad as marxism/leftism which is nonsense.
Probably people that realise the left is on the eve of their death cult phase and going to lose all legitimacy everywhere soon but enjoy the tactics of leftists so what to hop onto the 'right' while still using the same tactics.
A key indicator is their language mostly as they aren't willing to call a retard a retard, always have to fluffy it up and I only do that around kids and people who pay me, not 24/7.
Tucker isn't even speaking out for "white interests". He's just speaking out against racial hatred.
he's the biggest defender of White people on mainstream TV AND he doesn't openly over the top simp for israel unlike other mainstream "right wing" TV pundents. . So he gets more attention from people who hate people who speak for White interests.
How did he 'speak for White [sic] interests'?
He just spoke up for... normality.
in this day and age , even defending White people specifically from White hatred is speaking up for White interests. What other mainstream TV pundent does that?
with the overtone window where it is, normality and white interests both go in the same direction. if the window shifts back, the divergence would be noticeable.
I think it's a mistake to pretend that Tucker is somehow making radical demands, rather than the very normal demand that white people be treated fairly.
I don't think he's making radical statements. I think he's pushing return to normalcy which happens to also serve white interests. Once whites are no longer discriminated against, I don't think he'd push further.
The left. If it falls apart under a half second of scrutiny, it's from the left.
They're good at building a house of cards, and lying.
It's a divide and conquer strategy. It's only natural that we don't align on everything all the time. what's important is that we oppose the elite agenda to take away our right to free speech, free assembly, self-defense, and general autonomy.
Who are the main agents or influencers leading the "divide and conquer" strategy? Is it these liberals or members of the "woke right" they are calling out?
my guess would be the elite playing both sides.
The thing is, Elon's sperg session started with specific instigators, primarily Laura Loomer. Is she leading a psy-op the divide and conquer the Right? I'm skeptical that such a thing is having an effect. It's mostly organic.
They will say ANYTHING to stop a white identity movement.