Let me get this right...to protect Jews, the government just made it illegal to claim the government is controlled by Jews.
Also, denying or questioning the exact telling of history. Current history. Since it's changed a few times already.
Or of accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel than "their own countries." I mean...what if they say openly that that's the case, and they're more loyal to Israel than where they are living? Is that still illegal? Can I not accuse Ben Shapiro, for example, of being more loyal to Israel than the US? He's said as much.
Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state...and how do I get in on that grift? Would certainly make things simple, if ethnostates were a yuman right.
And, uh...Jews did kill Jesus.
It's all so tiresome. But tell me again about the wonders of Judeo-Christian values. Also, the absolute arrogance (and, admittedly, massive power move, so props; impressive, if nothing else) that they managed to make it so other religions also have to acknowledge them as the Chosen Ones. I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare. But I don't have to believe it, and it's not hateful of me to refuse to state that you're better and more holy than I, because of your race. Absolutely ridiculous.
Even the rules here also technically bans the bible. The bible specifically says jews killed Jesus, but the rules here say that we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
I guess the problem is blaming all jews for what #notalljews did. On the one hand, it wasn't like every single jew was hunting down Jesus for "heresy." Some, perhaps many, sought him out for wisdom or healing. On the other hand, the argument could be made that any group of jews would have demanded Jesus be crucified in a similar setting. The issue is taking in the symbolism of the scene versus the explicit text. That is, it is not explicitly stated that the whole jewish population did or would have done this (he had his disciples y'know).
I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare
Actually this was rescinded because God let them know that they were whores who kept whoring themselves out to other gods (the entire book of Hosea is about Israel being nothing but whores, which is why God had Hosea marry a whore so he would know what it felt like); they broke the Covenant he made with them COUNTLESS times. Even though he kept giving them multiple second chances.
Anyway, that was the whole point of Jesus dying on the cross, so everyone could be saved through him because Jews were no longer going to be the only ones to be chosen to inherit God's gifts, and Revelations basically makes it known that they would lose everything and constantly fall under the oppression of their enemies because they couldn't stop being whores (literally and figuratively).
Jesus has one "bride", the Christian church. The New Testament says that Israel is no longer a specific ethnic group. Israel is Christianity.
Dispensationalism is heresy and satanic, pushed and funded by jewish subversives for well over 100 years. As an easy example, look into who funded the Scofield Bible, and how a seeming nobody somehow became prominent on the world stage.
Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state
Since it was invented. That's what that meant. A people's right of self-political determination meant that a government had to be formed which was the full representation of it's nation. This is the concept of a Nation State, which (outside of a Liberal Civic National state), is literally just an Ethno-State. The Left never recognized Religious States as legitimate. The Left reversed course on Nationalism and don't want to admit that most Nationalist movements were done by the political Left for anti-Colonialism at the time. They do want to claim that Nationalism caused wars, but this was in response to the fact that the political Left's concept of Nation States meant that each government would just declare that a member of an ethnic group in a different country meant that their government had a legitimate claim to that land. This caused major population displacement, and fairly arbitrary justifications for land-grabs. They just don't want it to be clear that they were the ones doing it. Hell, the Zionist & Palestinian movements is literally the same concept.
Let me get this right...to protect Jews, the government just made it illegal to claim the government is controlled by Jews.
Also, denying or questioning the exact telling of history. Current history. Since it's changed a few times already.
Or of accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel than "their own countries." I mean...what if they say openly that that's the case, and they're more loyal to Israel than where they are living? Is that still illegal? Can I not accuse Ben Shapiro, for example, of being more loyal to Israel than the US? He's said as much.
Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state...and how do I get in on that grift? Would certainly make things simple, if ethnostates were a yuman right.
And, uh...Jews did kill Jesus.
It's all so tiresome. But tell me again about the wonders of Judeo-Christian values. Also, the absolute arrogance (and, admittedly, massive power move, so props; impressive, if nothing else) that they managed to make it so other religions also have to acknowledge them as the Chosen Ones. I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare. But I don't have to believe it, and it's not hateful of me to refuse to state that you're better and more holy than I, because of your race. Absolutely ridiculous.
Even the rules here also technically bans the bible. The bible specifically says jews killed Jesus, but the rules here say that we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
I guess the problem is blaming all jews for what #notalljews did. On the one hand, it wasn't like every single jew was hunting down Jesus for "heresy." Some, perhaps many, sought him out for wisdom or healing. On the other hand, the argument could be made that any group of jews would have demanded Jesus be crucified in a similar setting. The issue is taking in the symbolism of the scene versus the explicit text. That is, it is not explicitly stated that the whole jewish population did or would have done this (he had his disciples y'know).
Actually this was rescinded because God let them know that they were whores who kept whoring themselves out to other gods (the entire book of Hosea is about Israel being nothing but whores, which is why God had Hosea marry a whore so he would know what it felt like); they broke the Covenant he made with them COUNTLESS times. Even though he kept giving them multiple second chances.
Anyway, that was the whole point of Jesus dying on the cross, so everyone could be saved through him because Jews were no longer going to be the only ones to be chosen to inherit God's gifts, and Revelations basically makes it known that they would lose everything and constantly fall under the oppression of their enemies because they couldn't stop being whores (literally and figuratively).
The chosen status was rescinded when they rejected Jesus. That was their last chance, hence Jesus lamenting Jerusalem.
Don't tell mainstream evangelicals this. They'll have a heart attack.
Jesus has one "bride", the Christian church. The New Testament says that Israel is no longer a specific ethnic group. Israel is Christianity.
Dispensationalism is heresy and satanic, pushed and funded by jewish subversives for well over 100 years. As an easy example, look into who funded the Scofield Bible, and how a seeming nobody somehow became prominent on the world stage.
Telling the truth about them puts them at risk. Think about that for a while.
Since it was invented. That's what that meant. A people's right of self-political determination meant that a government had to be formed which was the full representation of it's nation. This is the concept of a Nation State, which (outside of a Liberal Civic National state), is literally just an Ethno-State. The Left never recognized Religious States as legitimate. The Left reversed course on Nationalism and don't want to admit that most Nationalist movements were done by the political Left for anti-Colonialism at the time. They do want to claim that Nationalism caused wars, but this was in response to the fact that the political Left's concept of Nation States meant that each government would just declare that a member of an ethnic group in a different country meant that their government had a legitimate claim to that land. This caused major population displacement, and fairly arbitrary justifications for land-grabs. They just don't want it to be clear that they were the ones doing it. Hell, the Zionist & Palestinian movements is literally the same concept.
Be a Progressive Nationalist.