Just skim read this utter drivel, but hey, at least in the last paragraph that dipshit had the brain cells to realise that maybe treating white men like subhuman all the time isn't a good idea. Which puts him at least a couple of iq points above the average leftist.
While true, they have no solution or intention to actually do this.
I’ve read several articles like this from feminists, blacks, fags and they all are in agreement that maybe they shouldn’t push White men to the point of no return, but only feminists offer a solution (dialog or some shit).
Why?
Because feminists know that the worst outcome from them is to turn into real women again. Everyone else will face almost certain death.
Oh I know. That's why I didn't give him too much of a concession. But he is in contrast of the average leftoid talking points I keep seeing which are:
"Uhm, we shouldn't have to constantly cater to straight white men to get our 'basic human rights' [sic]"
"we shouldn't have to coddle straight white men so that they don't become nazis, it should just be a given that you don't immediately become a nazi if a woman doesn't give you the time of day"
"if not everything being about you, makes you a nazi then maybe you're just a horrible human being"
And yes, pretty much all of the arguments are phrased in a way that indicates that women and minorities are just constantly bootlicking those evil white men and the moment they stood up and said "hey, could I perhaps, maybe have some human rights as well, if it would not inconvenience you too much", the evil straight white men immediately turned into turbo Hitler and are now roaming the streets randomly murdering those minorities and raping all the women.
Plenty of them concede that point. "What is the least we can concede here to purchase the buy-in of self-destruction for this group?" Is a common leftist question.
Just skim read this utter drivel, but hey, at least in the last paragraph that dipshit had the brain cells to realise that maybe treating white men like subhuman all the time isn't a good idea. Which puts him at least a couple of iq points above the average leftist.
While true, they have no solution or intention to actually do this.
I’ve read several articles like this from feminists, blacks, fags and they all are in agreement that maybe they shouldn’t push White men to the point of no return, but only feminists offer a solution (dialog or some shit).
Why?
Because feminists know that the worst outcome from them is to turn into real women again. Everyone else will face almost certain death.
Oh I know. That's why I didn't give him too much of a concession. But he is in contrast of the average leftoid talking points I keep seeing which are:
"Uhm, we shouldn't have to constantly cater to straight white men to get our 'basic human rights' [sic]"
"we shouldn't have to coddle straight white men so that they don't become nazis, it should just be a given that you don't immediately become a nazi if a woman doesn't give you the time of day"
"if not everything being about you, makes you a nazi then maybe you're just a horrible human being"
And yes, pretty much all of the arguments are phrased in a way that indicates that women and minorities are just constantly bootlicking those evil white men and the moment they stood up and said "hey, could I perhaps, maybe have some human rights as well, if it would not inconvenience you too much", the evil straight white men immediately turned into turbo Hitler and are now roaming the streets randomly murdering those minorities and raping all the women.
Plenty of them concede that point. "What is the least we can concede here to purchase the buy-in of self-destruction for this group?" Is a common leftist question.