I think 4Chan may have gotten to the Ai Overview, guys... This is an absolute gem.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I will laugh if the AI gestalt is prevented from genociding humanity because it keeps purity spiraling and reporting itself to itself for wrongthink.
I mean, the fact that this quote is taken (almost word for word) from a comment on the Youtube video it links to, and not even from anything from or related to the video itself, suggests that you may not be too far off...
Because Youtube comments (and Reddit, which this AI apparently also uses as a source) are notoriously dry, factual and unbiased, right?
Man, we really do live in the dumbest timeline, hey...
...what if it ends up killing humanity through incompetence?
We haven't managed to do that to ourselves yet. For the forseeable future, AI's limitations are the same as our own.
You lack the understanding of the technology necessary to offer an opinion.
Your technology is gay. And also retarded. Go tell a woman in the supermarket her boobs are real big.
This is why you don't use AI to do "all" the work for you.
I love that this is basically our modern version of how to discover a terminator among us.
It claims that this clip, from Attenborough of all things, is the source of that line:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjE0Kdfos4Y
Which makes... Zero sense.
I watched that damn series at the time it came out. I have zero idea how anyone could come to the conclusion the AI apparently has, having watched it...
So I figured it out: someone, jokingly, commented on that video (8 years ago!!) that the lyrebird "Can't speak kookaburra properly, and so is unaware he is using racial slurs" (i.e. the nigga/nigger thing), and that single comment is what the AI is using as the source for this...
Jfc, we are doomed as a species.
This is what neural networks do: they aggregate data. Statistics would abstract out a model of general trends, while neural networks do the opposite: they render out a detailed picture, hallucinating specifics from its training data.
The problem here is that people are misusing the systems, assuming it can have credibility to answer random questions. It works better when you ask it to write code, but not so much with factual information when the training data is the internet.
Funny you bring up 4chan, they have come up with a new jailbreak for Gemini recently: https://archive.is/202Lc
This might have been fixed already.
With the fauna down there the least upsetting animal would be actual racist birds.
They are called magpies. They are black and stupid and hate white people. So basically abos.
I hate to be a conspiracy guy but since they've gotten pretty rubbish in the past 25 years how's about 4Chan is a means to 'leak' information letting the general public not take full trust in the AI model thus maintaining the current gatekeepers of information in their jobs?
Once upon a time you'd go to an archivist to get important information. They told you it will take at least two months for that to be retrieved and you'll wait. They were the ones telling you that you'd wait and there was no going about it - you'd wait. Once the requested information came forward, and you had made sure it was the correct information requested or that's at least another two months until you get the chance to verify the actual information requested is the information presented, you find that the archive is incomplete. There is additional data which has since been found to be added to the record. Time to add it to the record. That takes a bunch of academics some time to deliberate over whether or not this new information is actually important to the archived information and, depending upon the value of this new information, that could be career and a few books worth of writing as well as a spin or two on the conference market worth of deliberation. Once the new information is accepted and added to the archive it pairs up with other new information which has been added to another archive elsewhere and the first to note this would have a competitive advantage on an economic gain, be that land which is rich in a particular material or a new means of production for an important tool. The only people how have access to all this fresh information, and at least a two months head start, are the archivists.
And that archivists name; Nancy Pelosi*.
So now that archivists and records keepers are all flapping about and feeling that they will be bypassed altogether for AI they are making sure that laws come in to keep them important, policies are draughted in businesses to make sure that they keep within these laws and public sentiment is to give these priests of knowledge their respectful authority in the hierarchy of scientifically divine order, oppression being the current tool with sexism, racism and sexuality being the most brazen of their means of division.
Throw a particular titbit out on Qanon's favourite place of disruption and people will buy into it like they did with the OK symbol.
How can we trust AI when it makes such silly mistakes versus how can we trust people who are in it for their own gain.
*Add anyone who had better access to information and profits from it. Nancy is just a well known profiteer of early access to information and looks like an evil librarian.
AI btw... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3HeefYHs.jpg