I hate to be a conspiracy guy but since they've gotten pretty rubbish in the past 25 years how's about 4Chan is a means to 'leak' information letting the general public not take full trust in the AI model thus maintaining the current gatekeepers of information in their jobs?

Once upon a time you'd go to an archivist to get important information. They told you it will take at least two months for that to be retrieved and you'll wait. They were the ones telling you that you'd wait and there was no going about it - you'd wait. Once the requested information came forward, and you had made sure it was the correct information requested or that's at least another two months until you get the chance to verify the actual information requested is the information presented, you find that the archive is incomplete. There is additional data which has since been found to be added to the record. Time to add it to the record. That takes a bunch of academics some time to deliberate over whether or not this new information is actually important to the archived information and, depending upon the value of this new information, that could be career and a few books worth of writing as well as a spin or two on the conference market worth of deliberation. Once the new information is accepted and added to the archive it pairs up with other new information which has been added to another archive elsewhere and the first to note this would have a competitive advantage on an economic gain, be that land which is rich in a particular material or a new means of production for an important tool. The only people how have access to all this fresh information, and at least a two months head start, are the archivists.

And that archivists name; Nancy Pelosi*.

So now that archivists and records keepers are all flapping about and feeling that they will be bypassed altogether for AI they are making sure that laws come in to keep them important, policies are draughted in businesses to make sure that they keep within these laws and public sentiment is to give these priests of knowledge their respectful authority in the hierarchy of scientifically divine order, oppression being the current tool with sexism, racism and sexuality being the most brazen of their means of division.

Throw a particular titbit out on Qanon's favourite place of disruption and people will buy into it like they did with the OK symbol.

How can we trust AI when it makes such silly mistakes versus how can we trust people who are in it for their own gain.

*Add anyone who had better access to information and profits from it. Nancy is just a well known profiteer of early access to information and looks like an evil librarian.