Asking this because that’s why the feds are doing this to Alex Jones and it’s been so long that I honestly only remembered that because of the posts from earlier.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (84)
sorted by:
That it didn't happen. Crisis actor "parents," the worst being the guy that was laughing without a care in the world mere seconds before approaching a podium to give a teary-eyed speech.
Yup, and there was some stuff that people found suspicious about the emergency response, evacuation, and the like, as well as weird stuff like the parents all getting new houses or some weird stuff like that. I don't remember all the specifics, but there was some odd stuff. And, as per usual, it wasn't hard to find connections to the FBI.
I wouldn't swear by any of it, but people should certainly be allowed to theorize. "Conspiracy theories" are still protected speech. In fact, it should be the most protected speech, as it's usually against those in power, which is part of the whole point of the First Amendment, that the government doesn't get to shut down dissent.
Alternatively, that it was a false flag with real bodies and the government killed all those kids.
That was my thought. I never thought it didn't happen,just that it was orchestrated by TPTB to push for gun control. And it worked. Sandy Hook was to ammo prices what 9/11 was to gas prices. It immediately and eternally made prices skyrocket.
Then why didn't any gun control pass because of it?
Do you people ever think about this shit more than "not at all"?
So they waited until Republicans had control of congress, who would make sure no gun control happened, to stage this shooting, when they could've done it any time when Democrats had all of Congress under Obama?
As if establishment republicans have never cucked on guns before. Remember the AWB in the 90s, or the Hughes amendment in the 80s?
Except the claim is that the government was in on this.
Meaning, more than just some random retards at... whatever intelligence agency you think did it.
If this was a plan to take guns, do you not fucking think the CIA would've had all their ducks in a row before going through with it? You guys simultaneously believe that the government is literally capable of GODLIKE accomplishments when it comes to these conspiracy theories (no seriously, many of the things claim would've required nothing short of total omnipotence to execute as flawlessly as they supposedly do), and they couldn't have twisted the arms of like ten senators beforehand?
You think they literally would've blown their one and only shot at this just like that with such a ridiculously expensive, contrived plot, but they "forgot" that Republicans were in control? When Democrats were in control just a year prior?
How many >>>THOUSANDS<<< of people would've had to have been on this false flag, and not a single one has ever leaked? And that goes for every single conspiracy ever. Why is it that it just so happens that nobody 'leaks' anything when the government leaks like a sieve in every other regard? We couldn't even keep stealth secrets from fucking China.
That the plan failed doesn't mean there wasn't a plan.
Of course, that's not proof of a plan either, because the actual end result doesn't depend on a plan's existence.
IF it were to be planned, I'm sure a point of contention would be whether the supposed crimes would be heinous enough to get everyone unified to losing their freedoms, like 9/11 did.
The problem with all this HOAX HOAX CONSPIRACY retard-thoughts is that the dumbest motherfuckers alive just fall for them at face value and actively refuse to ever ask follow-on questions.
Let's start with this one:
If the shooting didn't happen, where are the 'dead' children?
It's been 12 years. Not a single person has tracked them down.
Wouldn't that be the smoking-gun evidence?
If it was fake there'd be a million new lines of investigation yet not a single one of the millions of retards who fall for every-conspiracy-ever have once put in the effort to actually try to procure evidence beyond "LOOK AT THE PIXELS".
Literally your proof is 'this guy had a weird look on his face for exactly 30 frames of video'.
And then they get mad when I point this shit out, almost like conspirafaggots know they're full of shit.
"Conspirafaggots" as opposed to blindly repeating the approved narrative? Ya, ill take conspirafaggot everyday
"Approved narrative" and yet you believe the same conspiracy theory script about every single conspiracy in total lockstep with everyone else, and you talk about it on websites that are hosted in the United States that suspiciously are never taken down by feds, because your narrative is soooo "disapproved".
Are you seriously this fucking gullible that you never noticed this shit, you faggot?
Lol, ok destiny.