Interesting
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Kim Iversen seems pretty even handed in reporting. She has spoken out against Israel's actions against civilians.
she has a video called "How Zionism Infiltrated Judaism". Basically trying to pretend like all the bad things that israel or zionists do has nothing to do with jews. . That's not even handed at all.
What would you consider to be the even handed approach on that?
to not go around trying to play apologist for jews because they already have so many people doing that as it is. Let them take responsibility for something for once instead of doing the bullshit "not real jews" or "not real judaism" every time something makes them look bad.
I'm not defending her positions on everything, just the war/genocide. It may be a good source for people who don't want to watch pro-Palestine channels but do want to know what's going on.
AND she has a video saying that nazis and globalists are the same. when they are completely different . According to her zionism has nothing to do with jews or judaism, and globalists are nazis. You see how stupid it is?
Iversen is very Pro-Palestine slanted much like a lot of the moderate/former left - Grunwald, Dore, Blumenthal, etc.
I like her coverage on occasion, but she is reflexively anti-Israel but without being pilled enough to address the JQ.
I kind of quit watching Iversen because of her reporting on the Israel-Gaza "war". Not because I thought it was one-sided (though IMO she's clearly pro-Palestinian) but because I don't care about either side and got tired of hearing about it.
Same with Greenwald.
I still catch them occasionally but they were both on my regular listen list before that story started dominating their time.