I believe there are now more women in graduate school than men too, so double discrimination. Women overwhelmingly outnumber men at the bachelor level already, with the only post-secondary in Canada to have more men than women being... the Royal Military College in Kingston.
The left really is living in the past. They like to pretend that it’s the 1920 and women and minorities are all being abused. Part of it is that there are women and minority grifters that perpetuate the idea for personal gain.
It's interesting because I know one leftist that is very stuck on that abuse. Excuses everything she sees now because they had to eat at a different lunch counter when she was a girl.
Some places do hire women because they're cheaper. Teaching is this way. I mean if you want to see it outside of government, there are private schools.
Young boys suffer under systemic apartheid throughout all their education.
it’s no wonder boys are vastly underrepresented in many subjects. Women are bullying them out. Computer science is about the only subject they can take to avoid them.
Their conclusion was not discrimination but that women are better at job applications?
Women succeeding means they did it on their own. Men succeeding means the patriarchy helped them. Every fucking time.
When it happens to women and blacks they call it discrimination, when it happens to White men they say we’re just not as good.
And they say white men aren't as good even though they're objectively better.
This is why we get subdisciplines like "Feminist glaciology"
I believe there are now more women in graduate school than men too, so double discrimination. Women overwhelmingly outnumber men at the bachelor level already, with the only post-secondary in Canada to have more men than women being... the Royal Military College in Kingston.
The left really is living in the past. They like to pretend that it’s the 1920 and women and minorities are all being abused. Part of it is that there are women and minority grifters that perpetuate the idea for personal gain.
Women weren't being abused in 1920, or at any other point in Western history.
I would argue that they aren't being abused anywhere else, either. They're treated the way they (NOT ALL!) demand to be treated.
It's interesting because I know one leftist that is very stuck on that abuse. Excuses everything she sees now because they had to eat at a different lunch counter when she was a girl.
No, it's because she's an abusive piece of shit, and she projects.
Probably.
It's the disease of the left. Pretend everyone else is guilty of what you are.
"Adherents of prolific modern religion find that the faithful and potential converts are favored"
Companies are enjoying keeping that extra twenty cents from hiring women over men?
That was such a major breaking point when I first actually thought about it. They’d just hire women because it’s cheaper.
They don't stick around long enough to build experience or stature either. They're fucking pushovers.
Some places do hire women because they're cheaper. Teaching is this way. I mean if you want to see it outside of government, there are private schools.
Young boys suffer under systemic apartheid throughout all their education.
it’s no wonder boys are vastly underrepresented in many subjects. Women are bullying them out. Computer science is about the only subject they can take to avoid them.
I 100% had this experience and I went to school in the 90s.
...Nature?
There's a scene in Erin Brochovich(sp) that explains the complexities and many issues involved here.
"They are called boobs, Ed."
Surprising my ass.