This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
I am sure I could go to the Congo or Afghanistan and find plenty of good people to break bread with, but all I would need to do is run into one or two people who hate me on sight with an itchy trigger finger and it would be game over.
And there are plenty of those running around, believe me.
There is not a fine line between brave and stupid in these cases. Every white idiot who ends up dead or raped in these third world shitholes got exactly what they deserved -- because you know none of them are taking the proper security measures.
99% of Whites have no idea of how powerful ethnic and tribal bonds are. They've never been exposed to it, it's never talked about, they can't even conceive it.
yeah we are breaking our own family bonds - even the core family of parents & children - and assume that other cultures where family ties are far more extense act & think the same.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
Murdering every white and then every mixed person on their half of the island doesn't constitute as blood lust? And yes mass executions during the French Revolution were also motivated by blood lust. Not sure where you got the idea that they weren't.
The mass executions were not motivated by blood lust, they were motivated by Rousseau. It is moral to compel the population by any means necessary to achieve acquiescence to "The General Will".
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.
I want Trudeau to be blood-eagled on live television, but that wasn’t the point of my comment.
The liberal white woman is 100% the one being backstabbed, having her own stupid leftist terminology used against her. Who’s right or wrong in the situation isn’t something I was weighing in on, I was just commenting how I’ve seen this happen to well to do busybody white people for most of my life.
All “allies” will inevitably be discarded and stabbed in the back at some point.
I’m from South Africa. I’ve seen this happen to white knight liberals over and over since the mid 90’s.
This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
Because these feuds go beyond individuals.
I am sure I could go to the Congo or Afghanistan and find plenty of good people to break bread with, but all I would need to do is run into one or two people who hate me on sight with an itchy trigger finger and it would be game over.
And there are plenty of those running around, believe me.
There is not a fine line between brave and stupid in these cases. Every white idiot who ends up dead or raped in these third world shitholes got exactly what they deserved -- because you know none of them are taking the proper security measures.
99% of Whites have no idea of how powerful ethnic and tribal bonds are. They've never been exposed to it, it's never talked about, they can't even conceive it.
yeah we are breaking our own family bonds - even the core family of parents & children - and assume that other cultures where family ties are far more extense act & think the same.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
Blah blah blah.
Edit: For everyone else's benefit. Jean-Jacques Dessalines, leader of the revolution and first leader of independent Haiti.
You can fuck right off, you faggot.
He's always trying to downplay anti-White racial hatred.
Now, has that sentiment ever been held by any other Leftist in history towards the bourgouise, faggot?
Murdering every white and then every mixed person on their half of the island doesn't constitute as blood lust? And yes mass executions during the French Revolution were also motivated by blood lust. Not sure where you got the idea that they weren't.
The mass executions were not motivated by blood lust, they were motivated by Rousseau. It is moral to compel the population by any means necessary to achieve acquiescence to "The General Will".
You’re the dumbass who said that when they killed the white women’s families and forced them to marry blacks, it wasn’t sex slavery because the women were married. I don’t feel inclined to listen to you about the racial politics of anything.
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.
Wtf? You think the white liberal woman is the one getting backstabbed?
What the fuck do you want from this situation? For the Native Americans to support Trudeau?
I want Trudeau to be blood-eagled on live television, but that wasn’t the point of my comment.
The liberal white woman is 100% the one being backstabbed, having her own stupid leftist terminology used against her. Who’s right or wrong in the situation isn’t something I was weighing in on, I was just commenting how I’ve seen this happen to well to do busybody white people for most of my life.