Pretty much any given wall of text you've posted in a thread where Jews are engaging in bad behavior and White people are taking exception to said behavior. This has been a trend with you for years as you are well aware.
Speaking more generally, I think one of the flaws in your framework might be that because you object to "racialism" across the board, you are unable to distinguish between attack and defense. An attack that is racial in nature will necessarily require a defense that is racial in nature. Were such a defense to be mounted, you would only be able to discern its racial nature and interpret it as a racial attack and consequently sperg out as is your wont.
It's not a flaw. It's a feature. I'm not tolerating an attack or defense argument at all. This is because there is no defensive argument. One does not exist. Just because you blame all jews for something a Communist did, doesn't mean you get to kill your half-jewish neighbor in a reprisal attack. You call that "defense", I call that an unjustified attack on an innocent person.
This is because, fundamentally, the effort to declare collective crimes is always intentionally capricious. Declaring race crimes allows anyone to be attacked for any perceived violation of no law. This is because no race can commit a crime. So, you simply make an assertion, declare guilt, and then attack any number of people you chose, without trial, at your leisure. It's not justice, it's terrorism, and it should be met with violent self-defense as your terrorism is conducted.
You don't have a defense. Racialism is not justifiable. You are required to treat people as they act, not as you capriciously declare them to act as a collective based on your own bigotry.
If you did get your way, then you would earn the very violence you claim to defend yourself against, because the people attacking you will make the EXACT same "defense" argument 100% of the time. "Lowercase W white People are using the Police to Genocide blacks! 14,000 unarmed Uppercase B Black people are killed every year!" was the last one that was used. And so therefore, somehow, their 155 consecutive days of Krystalnacht was somehow legitimate using your bullshit logic.
You are the teacher that sees a fight going on and grabs the victim and holds his arms behind him as the bully pulls a knife and gets to stabbing. And all the while you are yelling at the victim to stop fighting.
Would you like to show me where I've approved of stabbings, genocides, ethnic cleansings, racial discrimination, or the systemic and institutionally supported rape of white girls in England?
You can't, because I didn't, and I've repeated the harshest criticism against it.
"Only racialism can stop racialism" is as retarded and stupid as when the other Leftists do it. In fact it's literally why they think raping little white girls is okay. You want to believe that racialism is the only way to defend a race, but normally all it does is destroy that very race and prolong it's immiseration and it only generates more ongoing racial violence.
Any time there is not a balance of forces you get a net acceleration. You stopping the force from one direction, cause the force from the other direction to win.
Pretty much any given wall of text you've posted in a thread where Jews are engaging in bad behavior and White people are taking exception to said behavior. This has been a trend with you for years as you are well aware.
Speaking more generally, I think one of the flaws in your framework might be that because you object to "racialism" across the board, you are unable to distinguish between attack and defense. An attack that is racial in nature will necessarily require a defense that is racial in nature. Were such a defense to be mounted, you would only be able to discern its racial nature and interpret it as a racial attack and consequently sperg out as is your wont.
It's not a flaw. It's a feature. I'm not tolerating an attack or defense argument at all. This is because there is no defensive argument. One does not exist. Just because you blame all jews for something a Communist did, doesn't mean you get to kill your half-jewish neighbor in a reprisal attack. You call that "defense", I call that an unjustified attack on an innocent person.
This is because, fundamentally, the effort to declare collective crimes is always intentionally capricious. Declaring race crimes allows anyone to be attacked for any perceived violation of no law. This is because no race can commit a crime. So, you simply make an assertion, declare guilt, and then attack any number of people you chose, without trial, at your leisure. It's not justice, it's terrorism, and it should be met with violent self-defense as your terrorism is conducted.
You don't have a defense. Racialism is not justifiable. You are required to treat people as they act, not as you capriciously declare them to act as a collective based on your own bigotry.
If you did get your way, then you would earn the very violence you claim to defend yourself against, because the people attacking you will make the EXACT same "defense" argument 100% of the time. "Lowercase W white People are using the Police to Genocide blacks! 14,000 unarmed Uppercase B Black people are killed every year!" was the last one that was used. And so therefore, somehow, their 155 consecutive days of Krystalnacht was somehow legitimate using your bullshit logic.
You are the teacher that sees a fight going on and grabs the victim and holds his arms behind him as the bully pulls a knife and gets to stabbing. And all the while you are yelling at the victim to stop fighting.
Fuck you.
Would you like to show me where I've approved of stabbings, genocides, ethnic cleansings, racial discrimination, or the systemic and institutionally supported rape of white girls in England?
You can't, because I didn't, and I've repeated the harshest criticism against it.
"Only racialism can stop racialism" is as retarded and stupid as when the other Leftists do it. In fact it's literally why they think raping little white girls is okay. You want to believe that racialism is the only way to defend a race, but normally all it does is destroy that very race and prolong it's immiseration and it only generates more ongoing racial violence.
Any time there is not a balance of forces you get a net acceleration. You stopping the force from one direction, cause the force from the other direction to win.
Let me stop you right there.
This is a retarded and malicious take on your part because you know it isn't true. That or hyperbole.
Either way you're posting word walls, which means my analysis was accurate enough to have upset you again.
Why do you choose to live in dishonest intellectual squalor when you could just accept that I oppose racialism?
Because you specifically defend Jews in ways you don't defend other groups.
You aren't honest about your racial biases.