he has 10% of a point, jew that he is. if your enemy's civilians are completely supportive of your enemy (understandably) and let them use these tactics you have little recourse but to just start killing the supportive civilians too.
if they're not completely supportive, then they're completely incompetent and ought be receptive to being evacuated/selected through by the invading force so as to get rid of the combatant force in their midst they don't want there.
if they're not supportive, incompetent, and not receptive, then you have to revert to the medieval tactics of just killing civilians if you feel like it, otherwise your war is literally impossible (as we saw with the US having to leave the middle east instead of glassing it). the idea of civilians being sacred is a modern development, after all.
of course, this is all philosophical musing and speculation. i'd much rather the mohammedans win, they're an easier enemy after israel is gone.
This also presumes good faith on the part of the forces pushing the evacuation. At this point I see a concentrated effort of genocide perpetrated by OUR GREATEST ALLY.
ought be receptive to being evacuated
Yeah, about that. A month or two people trying to evacuate were getting bombs dropped on them.
I also like from a few weeks back "Hey, I know we've been shooting you all for the last several decades, stealing your land, and bombing your evacuees, but let's have a cease fire so we can give your kids injections."
I have no words.
he has 10% of a point, jew that he is. if your enemy's civilians are completely supportive of your enemy (understandably) and let them use these tactics you have little recourse but to just start killing the supportive civilians too.
if they're not completely supportive, then they're completely incompetent and ought be receptive to being evacuated/selected through by the invading force so as to get rid of the combatant force in their midst they don't want there.
if they're not supportive, incompetent, and not receptive, then you have to revert to the medieval tactics of just killing civilians if you feel like it, otherwise your war is literally impossible (as we saw with the US having to leave the middle east instead of glassing it). the idea of civilians being sacred is a modern development, after all.
of course, this is all philosophical musing and speculation. i'd much rather the mohammedans win, they're an easier enemy after israel is gone.
This also presumes good faith on the part of the forces pushing the evacuation. At this point I see a concentrated effort of genocide perpetrated by OUR GREATEST ALLY.
Yeah, about that. A month or two people trying to evacuate were getting bombs dropped on them.
I also like from a few weeks back "Hey, I know we've been shooting you all for the last several decades, stealing your land, and bombing your evacuees, but let's have a cease fire so we can give your kids injections."
Okay, so you don't kill the terrorists, and they kill you (and rape your wife and kids). How does your moral high ground feel?
Retarded takes on combat on this sub.
Please keep telling us how the IDF bombing civilians, basically on purpose, is a good thing. It's quite educational.
Then figure out how you'd win the war, and tell us all. I'm sure your galaxy brain has all the answers, right?
1: Like any problem you can can start by figuring out what not to do. Hint: Bombing civilians is on that "Shit to not do" list.
2: You already HAD an answer from u/ApparentlyImAHeretic
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1994yNM55j/israel-apparently-hacked-hezboll/c/4ZF9o5GJYiu
Also, it's like 12:30 in the morning Tel Aviv time. Are you going off shift soon?