The first few polls for Heels Up Harris vs President Trump are out.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (85)
sorted by:
Speak it quietly...JD Vance needs to shut up or we will lose.
It's easy to bring up cheating, but Vance is attacking the main groups who switched from Democrats to GOP. Young men and childless men.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of flak for bringing this up, but it's something Trump absolutely needs to address - a pro-family platform will lose hard.
All of them need to shut the fuck up about everything but immigration.
Immigration, economics, and foreign policy. Those are the big three. Stop encouraging people to come here en masse, stop taxing and spending ridiculous sums of money on bullshit, and stop making the world a worse place through bombings and foreign aid.
Immigration and economics are intertwined. The Trump campaign is positioning itself to be Iran hawks. That's why they should should the fuck up.
Ah, but most of the natalists like Vance hate the idea of spending less money.
They just want to spend more money on the failed experiment of bribing people to have kids, which everyone knows doesn't work because South Korea already tried it.
We wouldn't need an aggressive birth policy if those in charge actually had any economic intelligence. The welfare/social security etc Ponzi will crash down eventually. The best you can do is prop it up for those close to needing it and slowly phase it out.
The only way we can "bribe" people into having more kids is to bribe them into having stable families.
This means stable manufacturing jobs. Good paying jobs that lead into a stable life which leads into a stable family.
Bribe them with a decent economy and a fair justice system.
Bribe them with all the fruits of good citizenship.
That's the only way to fix this country. Every day under this administration we stray further from this.
But you cannot ever put a bandaid on this problem. Money can never replace stability and continuity in development of our children.
You finally admit that "single men are the enemy" rhetoric doesn't work?
Part of me wonders if Vance and infamous shill Richard Reeves have ever met.
Huh?
You agreed that he should shut up. Implying you know that this wedge issue is never going to win anything.
How?
You're really under a mistaken impression. Most people, especially the people Trump needs to court, want a situation where family is more feasible. Now, there are angles you could take that would genuinely be bad but, no, a pro-family platform is good politics. Sorry.
He backed giving them less of a vote and doubled down on it recently. The women's lobby are pumping up the "cat ladies" comment as a distraction.
I'm 100% sure of it, by looking at the data, that the kind of policy Vance wants is going to send the GOP to the political wilderness. Pro-family pandering worked decades ago when feminism wasn't so obviously present.
The only reason that the GOP is winning in polls is because young men have switched in high numbers. The same reason the PPP won in South Korea.
The PPP waited until after they cashed in the votes to turn their back on those who helped them. Vance has already stated it plainly.
Anyone who spoke at the Brookings Institute is a bad fucking candidate! Brookings is swamp!
But young men want families...
Based on what data?
How’d you get unbanned? I must have missed that somewhere.
The Mossad made the order.
Jokes aside, there's a rule here where if you remove the offending post, you can be unbanned.
I thought you'd like him for criticizing women.
You underestimate how important preventing White births is to Imp. I think it's his second highest priority behind supporting Israel.
I love that you're on his ass in multiple threads. It's nice to see specific pushback and not just "imp is retarded, what can we do?".
Thanks. It's tedious as all fuck dealing with his pipul bullshit. I did it again because it's been a while.
I'm not trying to prevent births. People who want kids will have them, people who don't shouldn't be forced to.
Why are you lining up with the WEF establishment, who also pushed the idea of taking rights from single men who won't procreate?
Uh, the WEF and globalists in general hate "overpopulation," and want less births. You're really claiming that a pro-family message is inline with the globalist goals? It's the opposite, and they've done everything they can for decades to destroy the family. It's one of the things they hate the most, in fact.
You cheer on the decline of White births while supporting Israel and attacking others for not supporting it despite its pro-natalist subsidies. The race of the births clearly matters to you.
It's not really criticizing women if he's pushing us to play happy families with threats to our rights.