The first few polls for Heels Up Harris vs President Trump are out.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (85)
sorted by:
Ah, but most of the natalists like Vance hate the idea of spending less money.
They just want to spend more money on the failed experiment of bribing people to have kids, which everyone knows doesn't work because South Korea already tried it.
We wouldn't need an aggressive birth policy if those in charge actually had any economic intelligence. The welfare/social security etc Ponzi will crash down eventually. The best you can do is prop it up for those close to needing it and slowly phase it out.
The only way we can "bribe" people into having more kids is to bribe them into having stable families.
This means stable manufacturing jobs. Good paying jobs that lead into a stable life which leads into a stable family.
Bribe them with a decent economy and a fair justice system.
Bribe them with all the fruits of good citizenship.
That's the only way to fix this country. Every day under this administration we stray further from this.
But you cannot ever put a bandaid on this problem. Money can never replace stability and continuity in development of our children.
Tax cuts for children is how you incentivize people who have a stable income, to reproduce.
Welfare for kids incentivizes low-IQ welfare leeches who produces more of the same. It also draws more welfare migrants.
I mean, I agree with this as well.
Tax cuts aren't a bribe and I won't really entertain a position otherwise.
Tax cuts are the only morally defensible course of action.
Exactly. You get people to have kids by giving them a world where they want to.
Attacking and dehumanizing men who don't is stupid even from a natalist standpoint, but they don't care because they think the feminists will help them.