Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8-FgrJ0J-o
In the cartoon a dog is dancing to some music. Woke faggot comes up to him, turns off his music and starts screaming. The dog turns the music again (he just wants to be left alone). After a while, the wokie smashes the dog's radio.
Instead of the dog tearing out his neck, he just gets sad and starts crying. Until, his friend brings another radio to play music.
The video ends there but if there was a next scene, it'd just the wokie smashing the second radio and the dogs going to walmart to get a new radio (to be smashed).
Ignoring certain people doesn't work.
Violence is justified in defense of your rightfully owned possessions.
It's also justified in defense of your friends/family and fellow man but not just when they are in immediate danger to their life but also when the quality of their life is in danger and their civilization is in danger.
In any case, what I'm saying is you are always justified to use violence against your enemies.
The Lord calls upon us to be shepherds.
It's a poor shepherd who refuses to shoot wolves.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
It's close, but not crossing the line, even given the context.
Am I wearing your favorite scent this week?
As a professional faggot, the smell of butthole is intoxicating
Well I'm a married man, so hop off my shoulder or people are going to start thinking you're in the sniffer club with old Joe.
there are several news companies who would be thrilled to see a maga hat sperging out and committing violence. you would do us all a disservice.
Found Justin Castro's account.
you kill them, everyone hates you, you get hung.
it's not that they win, you and everyone associated with you just lose.
In other words, we lose either way?
You are not always justified to use violence against your enemies, only when they meet the conduct that requires violent self-defense.
Hypothetically speaking, does attempted genocide count?
An actual genocide with targeted killings, yes.
So can we count hypothetical instances with white people getting targeted in inner cities by black people?
Not that it ever happens or anything, we all know black people never commit crime.
Those people can respond in self-defense.
You can not call for "communal self-defense" by going out and pre-emptively killing the black 7/11 worker who never wronged you, for "the crimes of his race".
Fuck your race war.
I'm asking questions here Dom. I want to understand your position on things, because clearly white people are being targeted, especially by black people.
White culture is being destroyed by the left.
At what point does it cross the line for you?
Don't be a butthurt jannie
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
You're not facing the same threat as uyghurs. Not even close.
Certainly it is not the case that "all forms of oppression" should be met with violence if you are comparing yourself to a uyghur. You're basically saying, "If I don't get accepted to Harvard, I can truck bomb them". So no.
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
You're actually fucking insane. You think that you can resort to mass violence because you were denied a theoretically lowered maximum quality of life. 'I didn't win the lottery, therefore I can shoot the gas station attendant.'
I mean, jesus, it doesn't even make sense from a racist's perspective. If you institute segregation, then blacks have every right to commit a genocide because they didn't get to sit on the stool at the diner. Worse, at institutional level they can't sit at the stool on any diner ever. Mass murder is the only justifiable solution to that because, somehow, sitting at the booth isn't acceptable.
And again, it's theoretical, explicitly because your quality of life absolutely can go down. You could take classes at Harvard and fail. You could stop going to class because you aren't learning anything. You could chose to stop attending because it isn't worth the money. Hell, you could quit because you didn't get on the football team, or your girlfriend is going to a different school. You could find that your classmates are shit and the teachers are worse. Yet, you reject all of these outcomes and assert that you MUST go to Harvard where you can ONLY get a quality of life increase, or you'll kill everyone.
Also, you threatened me because you're a fucking schizo that thinks I'm a jew.
All claims that people are deontologically evil will be taken as a call to violence.
The left has the MSM, Big Tech (including a big part of Twitter), Big Business, Big Finance, Big Brother, Big Justice, Big Entertainment, Big Education, Big Military, Wall Street, NGOs, etc. They even have 'Big Dictionary' on their side. Remember 'Merriam Webster' changing the definition of 'racism' during the DNC-fueled race riots?
There is no level playing field. There is also no 'cancel culture' in the arsenal of the right. It's just boycotts that fizzle out over time. Sure, they do damage, but not enough.
That is why I was disappointed that nothing happened when Trump almost ate shit.
Like nada. Zip. Just some stupid memes. Not a single window broken. Not a single store looted.
I don't think anything would have happened had Trump not turned his head at the last instant. I saw posts of how close we avoided civil war. Lol nope, maybe some stern letter and tweets.
The right is truly cucked.
I like how the only reason to ever watch Timcast is the other people and then he talks over them constantly.
Seamus Coughlin is a real Christian and this video is 'turn the other cheek'.
I prefer the one where Scooby shreds woke-Velma into a thousand pieces.
Incredibly important to remember that they absolutely will not leave you alone no matter what, they can only be stopped if you want things to be normal.