Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8-FgrJ0J-o
In the cartoon a dog is dancing to some music. Woke faggot comes up to him, turns off his music and starts screaming. The dog turns the music again (he just wants to be left alone). After a while, the wokie smashes the dog's radio.
Instead of the dog tearing out his neck, he just gets sad and starts crying. Until, his friend brings another radio to play music.
The video ends there but if there was a next scene, it'd just the wokie smashing the second radio and the dogs going to walmart to get a new radio (to be smashed).
Ignoring certain people doesn't work.
You are not always justified to use violence against your enemies, only when they meet the conduct that requires violent self-defense.
Hypothetically speaking, does attempted genocide count?
An actual genocide with targeted killings, yes.
So can we count hypothetical instances with white people getting targeted in inner cities by black people?
Not that it ever happens or anything, we all know black people never commit crime.
Those people can respond in self-defense.
You can not call for "communal self-defense" by going out and pre-emptively killing the black 7/11 worker who never wronged you, for "the crimes of his race".
Fuck your race war.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
You're not facing the same threat as uyghurs. Not even close.
Certainly it is not the case that "all forms of oppression" should be met with violence if you are comparing yourself to a uyghur. You're basically saying, "If I don't get accepted to Harvard, I can truck bomb them". So no.
Comment Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
You're actually fucking insane. You think that you can resort to mass violence because you were denied a theoretically lowered maximum quality of life. 'I didn't win the lottery, therefore I can shoot the gas station attendant.'
I mean, jesus, it doesn't even make sense from a racist's perspective. If you institute segregation, then blacks have every right to commit a genocide because they didn't get to sit on the stool at the diner. Worse, at institutional level they can't sit at the stool on any diner ever. Mass murder is the only justifiable solution to that because, somehow, sitting at the booth isn't acceptable.
And again, it's theoretical, explicitly because your quality of life absolutely can go down. You could take classes at Harvard and fail. You could stop going to class because you aren't learning anything. You could chose to stop attending because it isn't worth the money. Hell, you could quit because you didn't get on the football team, or your girlfriend is going to a different school. You could find that your classmates are shit and the teachers are worse. Yet, you reject all of these outcomes and assert that you MUST go to Harvard where you can ONLY get a quality of life increase, or you'll kill everyone.
Also, you threatened me because you're a fucking schizo that thinks I'm a jew.
All claims that people are deontologically evil will be taken as a call to violence.