Context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8-FgrJ0J-o
In the cartoon a dog is dancing to some music. Woke faggot comes up to him, turns off his music and starts screaming. The dog turns the music again (he just wants to be left alone). After a while, the wokie smashes the dog's radio.
Instead of the dog tearing out his neck, he just gets sad and starts crying. Until, his friend brings another radio to play music.
The video ends there but if there was a next scene, it'd just the wokie smashing the second radio and the dogs going to walmart to get a new radio (to be smashed).
Ignoring certain people doesn't work.
It's also justified in defense of your friends/family and fellow man but not just when they are in immediate danger to their life but also when the quality of their life is in danger and their civilization is in danger.
In any case, what I'm saying is you are always justified to use violence against your enemies.
The Lord calls upon us to be shepherds.
It's a poor shepherd who refuses to shoot wolves.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
It's close, but not crossing the line, even given the context.
Am I wearing your favorite scent this week?
As a professional faggot, the smell of butthole is intoxicating
there are several news companies who would be thrilled to see a maga hat sperging out and committing violence. you would do us all a disservice.
Found Justin Castro's account.
you kill them, everyone hates you, you get hung.
it's not that they win, you and everyone associated with you just lose.
In other words, we lose either way?
You are not always justified to use violence against your enemies, only when they meet the conduct that requires violent self-defense.
Hypothetically speaking, does attempted genocide count?
An actual genocide with targeted killings, yes.
So can we count hypothetical instances with white people getting targeted in inner cities by black people?
Not that it ever happens or anything, we all know black people never commit crime.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
You're not facing the same threat as uyghurs. Not even close.
Certainly it is not the case that "all forms of oppression" should be met with violence if you are comparing yourself to a uyghur. You're basically saying, "If I don't get accepted to Harvard, I can truck bomb them". So no.
All claims that people are deontologically evil will be taken as a call to violence.