Oh very well, we will have guard towers every 50 feet instead. But they must be fully manned 24/7/365, fully armed and have shoot to kill orders if they see literally anyone. I know some will find it difficult, but this is a compromise I am willing to make.
It's unfortunate that wildlife ends up suffering because people couldn't respect our borders.
15 years ago you could generally tell by the writing style what sex the writer is.
Now it all sounds like chicks.
Didn't have to be this way democrats.
sucks to suck. the wall must be built.
Oh very well, we will have guard towers every 50 feet instead. But they must be fully manned 24/7/365, fully armed and have shoot to kill orders if they see literally anyone. I know some will find it difficult, but this is a compromise I am willing to make.
50 feet? We have the technology to only need one every 2.5 miles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ygFeywrvjc
Under 1000 of them could cover the entire border.
Listen, I'm not willing to take any chances on this. I'm already ceding a lot of ground here.
The only people this will convince were already in favor of open borders.
I thought we were already talking about coyotes? 🤔
I though the left loves diversity. This is how diversity gets formed, a physical barrier separating populations until they can evolutionarily diverge.
I don't know, the Korean border is fairly interesting when it comes to wildlife, so maybe fully militarized is the way to go.
Like a billion fucking humans mucking things up and likely killing everything that moves has no impact at all. Fuck off.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This actually sounds more like a basic environmentalist argument.