The difference a day makes, I swear this drama has escalated quick in TWO days, he's put out a full tweet of it, I don't have X so someone else link it as I ain't making an account to that hellscape for this.
TLDR, he DID talk to a minor (hard on what age as that could be a 15 year old in the states but they live in France) back in 2017 but NO pictures were sent, NEVER met and it says it sometimes was inappropriate talk but that could've been the average gamer talk. Now he was banned in 2020 so they sat on this for 3 YEARS but Twitch settled a lawsuit he had with them and there was NO criminal charges at all for him.
So after the studio he founded kicked him out and a sponsor dropped him, other than be an idiot talking to a minor this is a nothing burger. It speaks WORSE on Twitch that they couldn't vet their internal messager given that Disrespect doesn't state if he KNEW at the time they were a minor and dropped talking to them when they found out.
And also speaks ill on all those saying "We knew about this for years" what that he was a fucking idiot for a basic mistake (why I mute everyone unless they're friends) or dod you think he was a pedo but sat on this waiting for blood in the water as that's even more disgusting.
17?? Yea. Technically a few months she would be legal. Definitely a non issue. Is it weird? Probably. But yeah, nothing illegal or criminal in messaging a 17 year old if there is no grooming involved. And if he did talk dirty but cut off contact upon realizing the persons age, i see zero problem with that.
Holy shit fucking thank you. People on this board tend to go hard on the virtue signaling for this issue. Doesnt help that we had many bouts of troll posts promoting actual pedophilia recently. But it's very refreshing to see actual eloquent pushback against modernist bullshit. Saving that comment for reference later.
Well said. Of course, both the pedo spammers on this board and modern society writ large also provide an eloquent, if unintentional, argument for setting an age of consent and sticking to it like hell, even if it’s a little arbitrary, so I don’t mind it being at 18… but pretending you’re a creep if you acknowledge that the 16 or 17 year old is obviously, visibly post-pubescent and would likely have been married or looking to marry as little as a century ago is strange.
(For that matter, I believe the legal age of consent is 16 in more individual states than not, although I could be wrong and I don’t know how that interacts with the federal law).
In the US, the majority of States use 16 as the age of consent. She would not be a minor.
Its 18 in every state, dreamer
You should try a simple Google search before sounding stupid.
Its 18 in every state and 21 in puerto rico, kid dreamer
17?? Too old for pajeet
The legal age of consent is 16 in most Western states/countries.
If the "minor" was 16+ I don't care.
Want to know something really weird that involves leap years, autism, and maths?
1 year = 365 days
18 years = 6570 days
Someone born on the 28th of Feb 2006 will be 6573 days old on the 27th of Feb 2024, but not yet considered 18. Because leap years are stupid.
It's even more strange when you go just a few days beyond that as 01/Mar/2006 to 01/Mar/2024 is 3575 days.
So the first example would end up with someone being 6574 days old when they were 18, and the second example someone would be a day older than that, but still having only just turned 18.
Because again, leap years are stupid!